biscuits

joined 1 year ago
[–] biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I guess it may be risky to remove drives from pool, so maybe it would be better to build to just move the whole secondary pool as the other commenter pointed out (at least for the first time, smaller increments should be easier to handle). But do you think my strategy with snapshots as backup is good overall or should I use something else?

[–] biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Thanks, I guess it's even better solution and doesn't involve kinda risky removing drives from pool. But do you think my strategy with snapshots as backup is good overall or should I use something else?

13
ZFS backup strategy (lemmy.sdfeu.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org to c/datahoarder@lemmy.ml
 

Hello,

I've been lately thinking about my backup strategy as I'm finalising building my NAS. I want to use ZFS and my idea was to have two drives in mirror (RAID-1) configuration and just execute periodical snapshots on such dataset. I want to the same thing in a second location, so in the end my files would be on 4 different drives in 2 different locations and protected by snapshots from deletion or any other unwanted modification.

Would be possible with this setup to just swap one of the drives in one location and have ZFS automatically rebuild data on the new drive and then I take the drive to second location and do the same so all drives would be exactly the same, instead of copying data manually? Though I believe all of the drives would need to be exactly the same size, is that right?

Is it a good idea in general or should I ditch it, or maybe just ditch the part with ZFS rebuilding and use instead some kind of software for that?

Thank you for your help in advance!

[–] biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org 1 points 1 year ago

At least CalyxOS, DivestOS offer Android 13 builds for FP4 (and obviously LineageOS, but it doesn't have OTA updates, afaik)

[–] biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org 3 points 1 year ago

Well, IPx5 is technically water resistant for water jets and up to 12.5 liters per minute. I think that sounds enough to be used it rain. I also saw some reviews of other devices that even IPx4 is fine in rain.

[–] biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

In my setup I still use reverse proxy even though all of my services are inside a VPN. IMO it is just more convenient to have services accesible as subdomains or subdirectory than as different ports.

[–] biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Kannst du es ins Englische übersetzen? Meine Deutsch ist nicht so gut und ich konnte nicht finden, was lases und lassmich bedeuten.