A basic fundamental of copyright law and fair use is if the result is transformative. People literally do stuff like make collages with copyright works and it's fine in many cases.

Turning pictures into an AI model (and that's being really generous in my phrasing as if the pictures have anything to do with the math) is just about one of the most transformative things you can do with a picture.

This is like copyright 101 and if you're shocked you don't understand what you're talking about in regards to copyright.

Open AI has been a farce ever since they disabled access to GPT3 for the sake of security.

This could be fine if it didn't immediately send all of your data to the internet.

But as is, fuck that and fuck you Microsoft.

Windows told me I don't have permission to do something. On my computer. As an administrator. Using the command line.

Fuck Windows, fuck Microsoft and their controlling asses, and fuck co-pilot and Open AI for contributing to artificial intelligence not only being closed source and proprietary, but encouraging the United States government to make it literally illegal to do it on the open source field as well.

People learning lessons from this need to go look at their business in China and reconsider

Vim really is an IDE, not a text editor. It's usable as an editor but overkill.

Nano serves a difference purpose. It's like telling someone on a bike that a mustang is better.

These attacks don't work in the long term. You can confuse current systems like clip but the moment a new one is trained your system stops working.

Windows 11 coerced me into being an Ubuntu user.

No, that's about how it is on Linux.

Some drivers just work. Others? Absolute pain in the ass. If it doesn't work on first boot you're probably screwed.

Source: my laptops audio still doesn't work with Linux.

Because you're training a detector on something that is designed to emulate regular languages closest possible, and human speech has so much incredible variability that it's almost impossible to identify if someone or something has been written by an AI.

You can detect maybe your typical generic chat GPT type outputs, but you can characterize a conversation with chat GPT or any of the other much better local models (privacy and control are aspects which make them better) and after doing that you can get radically human seeming outputs that are totally different from anything chat GPT will output.

In short, given a static block of text it's going to be nearly impossible to detect if it's coming from an AI. It's just too difficult to problem, and if you're going to solve it it's going to be immediately obsolete the next time someone fine tunes their own model

on my iPhone

Next step: get an Android so your can use the real Firefox

Misleading as hell titles for this running around. I thought she was just driving fast based on what I saw in the headlines last week. She totally deserves the murder charges.

If you think those industries work on the competency of their programmers instead of the competency of their systems you've got a big surprise coming for you