adeoxymus

joined 1 year ago
[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Isn’t “it takes two” couch coop?

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

IMO the way to prevent such a scenario from happening is not by blocking Meta, but by inviting equally large competitors to join the fediverse. The described tactic can only work if you have close to a monopoly.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (12 children)

They’re right though. Top of the line software for certain domains (CAD, photoshop) just doesn’t exist for Linux. As much as I would want it to be.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It doesn’t read as if the author is generalizing all Europeans, it reads more as if he’s criticizing European policy. For what it’s worth in his book he’s very critical of Brexit as well.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Would be it a bit weird to have a community where we’re not posting stuff right?

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Reality: most tech workers view it as fairly rated or slightly overrated according to the real data: https://www.techspot.com/images2/news/bigimage/2023/11/2023-11-20-image-3.png

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The paper I showed earlier disagrees

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think the use case is not people doing potato study but people that want to lose weight and need to know the amount of calories in the piece of cake that’s offered at the office cafeteria.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

It needn’t be exact. A ballpark calorie/sugar that’s 90% accurate would be sufficient. There’s some research that suggests that’s possible: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.01082.pdf

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No paywall: https://archive.ph/2023.11.12-212740/https://www.ft.com/content/8fde56b7-2515-441a-9472-30c8aedcc200
Tbh, the article doesn’t really talk about the headline. Just some history and talk about Elon musk and Twitter. Not a convincing argument about social media in general.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because you were replying to this statement by OP:

and as societies get richer in material wealth they produce fewer children and have the luxury to pay attention to things like the environment and their impact on it.

In short your source doesn't support your claim, but it does story OP's claim

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For crying out loud, Clyde... you need a bunch of science nerds to tell you something this obvious? Fine.

Lol, very first sentence in that source:

Three mechanisms influence the fertility decision of educated women: (1) the relatively higher incomes and thus higher income forgone due to childbearing leads them to want fewer children. [...]

 
view more: next ›