TechLich

joined 1 year ago
[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You forgot interrobang‽ The most important and incredulous reason for a compose key.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Hmmm...

That looks pretty paywally to me. That said, I'm all for people supporting independent media.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

This is called "semantic satiation" which are both pleasingly weird words now that I think about it...

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't think that's how it works? It's the client application that has the key for the end to end encryption, not the server. I don't think you need to trust the matrix server you use? I could be wrong, I don't know matrix particularly well.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, that's fair enough, though I'm not sure it's very different from malicious instances creating normal user accounts?

You can see when users from an instance are all suspiciously voting the same way at the same time regardless of whether they are usernames or IDs.

There's lots of legitimate users that only vote but never post so doing it based on that doesn't seem very effective?

The second problem is solved using public key cryptography, the same way that you can't impersonate someone else's username to post comments. Votes and comments are digitally signed (There would need to be a different public key for voting to maintain pseudonymity though).

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

How about pseudonymous as a compromise? Votes could be publicly federated but tied to some uuid instead of the username. That way you still have the same anti spam ability (can see that a user upvoted these things from this instance at this time) but can't tie it directly to comments or actual user accounts without some extra osint.

It might be theoretically possible to correlate the uuids with an account's activity and dox the user in some cases, especially with some instances having a single user, but it would be very difficult or impossible to do on larger instances and would add an extra layer. Single user instances would be kind of impossible to make totally private anyway because they can be identified by instance.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Haha, the internet did not fit on a 1.44mb floppy in 1998. Curious to know what was on this‽

1998 was well into the CD-ROM era and the internet was full of .mp3s and .isos by then.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Looks more /usr/bucket/cat

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago

They ruined Linux!

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Best is very subjective.

.world is a good general purpose instance for just about anything. I think it has the biggest population at the moment, so communities there are likely to get at least some engagement.

For "general discussion" it doesn't really matter. The instances are federated so you'll likely get general discussion in comments from lots of people from lots of instances anyway, wherever your community is based.

Some people get almost nationalistic about their chosen instances or have grudges against people from certain other instances. There's sometimes inter-instance politics with some servers defederating with others or threatening to for various reasons. It's kinda fun to watch in a popcorn drama kind of way. For the most part, the instance doesn't matter.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That's pretty cool!

Although that's probably what op is actually asking for, I don't think it's a modem. It's a router with an access point.

It does have SFP for a fibre connection and pcie and USB for you to potentially add a modem or whatever else you want.

I'm guessing OP is just looking for a wifi router? Otherwise we'd need to know what kind of modem they're looking for, like Cellular? VDSL? HFC? Satellite? It depends on the internet connection. Different parts of the world need very different kit.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yep, 100%. It's probably safe to call it like it is and he doesn't have a great track record with lawsuits at the moment. That said, they might still just not want to take the risk if their research is showing that painting him as a fool who you wouldn't want in the job is more effective with people who might change their minds.

view more: next ›