Yeah, but then, if, say 20% of voters in swing states voted third party, it would let the greater evil in, this being the very immoral choice.
Surely a more relevant measure is what can I do that will do the most good. Voting for someone who is better than the other realistic option, this keeping extremists out of power feels like a more moral option than making a pointless vote.
This was my thinking
Is this Birmingham, Alabama or Birmingham, UK, though?
Some say a dick move, some.say a fairly reasonable precaution against people getting the 1 dollar trial, playing through the game in two weeks and getting a 70 dollar game for a dollar.
ah, yeah, probably.
How do I cross post a post?
I wonder if repeatedly attaking un peacekeepers will affect this?
Fuck Israel. Genocidal fucks.
and they've got a pretty good justification for it too
Yeah, but ranked choice isn't in operation, so you've got to make the better choice for right now.
Also, in that case Trump would be the better option. I would hope that in a scenario where the republicans had nominated Hitler that the democrats could do better than Trump but if they couldn't, then yes, voting for Trump in that scenario would be r the right thing to do as voting for, say, Bernie Sanders I. that scenario would let, you know, Hitler become the President.