Someone

joined 11 months ago
[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Ahh, that makes sense. It was the second part that threw me off.

The difference of course being that bartenders get paid barely anything and tips are expected to be the majority of their income while baristas are supposed to be paid regular wages.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Right, but unless I'm misunderstanding you, I don't understand why we should be tipping bartenders but not baristas. The amount of work and skill required seems comparable (I've never done either so I can't say that definitively), they're almost the same job with different ingredients.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Are there any provinces that still have a lower minimum wage for alcohol servers? BC got rid of that years ago.

Unless you mean minimum wage in general is barely anything.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

Imposed arbitration is bullshit.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Like, trying to get those who primarily sell to working class folks to see how raising the minimum wage actually benefits them, because it means that all of their customers have more money to spend is nigh impossible. All they see is that they'll have to raise prices, and it makes them even more hostile toward their employees.

Yeah this argument never really made sense to me. Unless your product's only input cost is labour (which I can't think of a single job that would apply to, let alone close to minimum wage job) your costs should only have to go up by a fraction of the minimum wage increase. This would leave a minimum wage worker/customer better off after buying your product than they would have if it was cheaper.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

But isn't the capital gains tax only on the new capital gained? What you're saying actually sounds like a decent argument against sales taxes.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the party is taking a stand against a policy that disproportionately affects wealthy people and big corporations.

What about every single other policy that's even tangentially related to affordability that disproportionately affects everyone who isn't wealthy and small businesses?

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Producers would also be able to package multiple products together as long as the package is still under the 30-gram limit, and products inside also meet packaging requirements. The change would mean producers could sell higher quantities of edibles in one outer package.

Hopefully this means I can get something like a 6 pack of drinks.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I think the number one factor there is real estate. You can't start a farm out of your apartment and restaurants can't easily exist out in the boonies where rent is cheaper.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Assuming you're talking about a full service retirement home and not just a 55+ building $5000/mo seems like a good deal to me, at least from a BC perspective. You'd be looking at almost $2000 just to rent anywhere, you'd be lucky to have a meal cooked for you for $10, $20 if it's decent quality, that's another $900-1800/month. Once you consider utilities you're pretty close to what a new renter would be paying if they refused to cook for themselves.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

I mean it's worth it for the cool knives alone.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's be real, those of us who can't afford housing can't afford a jacked up F350.

view more: next ›