[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Shit legislation with lack of price-negotiation through collective bargaining, is the main issue, costs land at the individual enduser in the end. They could've likely gotten half the money and save the twins but instead they'll get none with that pricetag calculated from putting a number to the value of a human life - that makes most insurers pull out the fineprint and drop coverage overnight..

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

While you have a point you might consider what little free time young people have is largely spent on social media full of dark patterns and negative feedback loops and/or gaming stuffed with gambling. One does not detract from the other problems you outline. "Phone bad" holds true as long as these big corporations insist on regulating themselves when all they do is feed people propaganda to keep anything from changing.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Given the size of Barry I think it's safe to assume he detests it.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They fund their political campaigns via taxes and put limits on spending and campaign seasons, just buy european-made instead if you're a fan.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

A lot of the problems boil down to FPTP-voting and the current way political campaigns are financed. They result in this polarized deadwater where money and power practically become synonymous words wielded to keep anything from changing via journalism and the courts on this matter. It's exactly as intended by the old roman aristocrats that designed it over 2 millenia ago to maintain influence regardless of voter outcomes.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Technofeudalism

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

When runaway capitalism is the norm and all the shareholders care about is that bottomline, then they will lean into the dystopia and be blatant about it when nobody is stopping them laughing all the way to the bank.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How long does it take to roll some video akin to tiktok and snapchat into it? Weed out all the bots at the same time by demanding fotoID and root out all the dirtbags abusing the app at the same time. Texting and chatting is so last decade anyway just leave it as a remnant of its birdie roots.

If it fails Meta will likely have to be broken up, their monopoly on social media is outrageous these days.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Campaign finance reform is necessary to tackle big business interests out for regulatory capture. Shift some of that subsidy into funding campaigns so the little guy stands a chance against them and their billionaire club.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The revolution is whenever people quit doing whatever the tv tells them and start unionizing/growing their network of relations to demand change.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

How streaming doesn't count as broadcasting is a tad too convenient for the studio to not be a deliberate loophole. Even when the language is tested in court the lobbyism favors the deep pockets asking to split hairs clearly in bad faith.

[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Indeed. an impartial judge wouldn't let studios split hairs over words like this but as long as they're appointed by politicians, they will side with whoever has the deeper pockets, because that's what's required for a continuing bright career.

view more: next ›

Odd_so_Star_so_Odd

joined 1 year ago