[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I have a Firestick with VLC on it that can browse my PC where I've got all my downloads. Not the most straightforward, but sometimes I want to watch on my PC and this keeps everything central.

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If you're talking about having family photos pirated, there's a privacy issue, not a property issue. Everyone talking about media in privacy talks about distributable media. If you want to include other things, that's on you, but you'll be yapping in the void as that isn't what the conversation is about. Not secrets, or private documents.

As for the term of taking, it's clear what taking means when you try to erroneously conflate piracy with stealing. It doesn't mean the same as taking a shit either, it has nothing to do with personal definitions, merely the accepted definitions when talking about either piracy, or stealing.

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm imposing that property on it because for the overwhelming majority of media that is absolutely the case.

  1. If it's for sale it's something you do not mind other people seeing. My documents I do not sell because I don't want people seeing it. If I were to sell them, clearly I don't mind people seeing it.

  2. Making it for sale means you intend to share it, even if conditionally. Also "taking it" doesn't apply, making a copy isn't taking anything.

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Very strange comparison, those private copies are specifically private. If you want our comparison to work, I'd be selling these private documents to others... Making them not very private.

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm asking you how the creator of the piece of media can tell the difference, because they can't.

If I make a chair, and someone steals it, I'm down a chair. If I make a chair and someone doesn't buy it, I still have the chair. There's a difference to the creator here that isn't there with digital media. That's why piracy and theft are not the same thing.

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

And the creator of the piece of media can tell the difference... How?

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No, I read it. It just has little to no bearing on the point, which is that there is still no victim. The makers of a game don't lose anything. They just don't realize a gain. A pirate is just as bad, and only as bad, as someone who doesn't make a purchase.

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Theft might do that, but piracy doesn't.

I think most Lemmy clients right now are in Alpha stages. I'm not surprised I'm constantly getting errors, crashes etc.

I don't want to link to anything directly, but it's possible to use ReVanced to get YouTube Music for free.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Necronomicommunist

joined 1 year ago