MightEnlightenYou

joined 1 year ago
[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

How about we both do the calculations and we cancel each others consultant fees?

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is also true for cars, but electric cars are viable even though its the same comparison between energy density. Would you be willing to have this conversation with actual calculations and specified arguments regarding the numbers?

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I like trains and I'm not American. You brought up energy density as the factor preventing long haul. Please don't appeal to authority as the argument but rather state what you think the energy density needs to be and why to make electric long haul viable.

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I'm curious what you think the energy density needs to be for it to be viable and why? The way I see it energy density is a very minor factor for this equation but I'm curious to hear your explanation.

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I know that's true in the US, but do you have a source for Europe on that?

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

The ones who disagree just say that "is not clearly visible in the data, yet" for anyone wondering.

If you go by simple physics it's undeniable that it should be speeding up, there are just too many variations and the dataset is too small for some scientists to want to make such conclusive statements.

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In the broad term I very much favour them. But when you actually read up on it a lot, like I have, the broad term loses its meaning and I always wonder what people actually mean by it when they say it.

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Article 16.3

The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

I disagree that the family is the fundamental group unit of society.

Article 25.2

Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

I feel discriminated that motherhood and not fatherhood are entitled to special care.

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

There are many variations of human rights declarations. I oppose this one the most: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cairo_Declaration_on_Human_Rights_in_Islam

There are also specific articles in the universal declaration of human rights that I think are wrong

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Just to take a jab at the US from a European perspective...

You don't have the right to bear arms in prison? I thought guns were sacred in the US!?

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, worked great so far!

[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It's illegal for you to sympathy strike and you don't have sector bargaining. The fact that I've never talked to an American who knows this and that a hundred year old law is what's stopping most of your progress is always sad to me. :/

 

So, I'm not really interested in your opinion since almost every comment or post that I've ever read online about trash is based on trash knowledge about trash. I'm actually posting this "question" because it's the biggest community on Lemmy where I can adjust my post to not break the rules and get a lot of people to read it.

This post is meant to inform you that unless you're from one of the top countries when it comes to recycling and handling trash your knowledge is lacking about what's possible and your country's experts, politicians and media don't know shit on this topic. I'm not going to make the environmental case since they already want better handling of trash. I'm going to tell you, with sources, how it's technologically possible and above all profitable to handle trash. Since I'm from Sweden and we're among the best in the world on trash I'm going to give you examples from Sweden.


Anyway, to the point

I know what your knee-jerk reaction is: "Burning trash, how's that environmental? What about air quality and other stuff?".

Well, we clean the fumes extremely well and take care of the remaining waste by either using it or putting it in very controlled landfills.

Burning 4 tons if trash is equal in energy to burning 1 ton of oil. There's your economical argument. We heat a million homes through district heating and provide electricity to 250,000 homes by burning trash. We're 10 million people in the country.

Alright, I'm getting tiered of writing since I don't know if this post will be removed or downvoted to obscurity I'm feeling my motivation diminishing so I'll just finish on the big topic of plastic.

You're wrong about plastic recycling. At least I've never read a comment that was right about it.

It is possible, and profitable to recycle almost all kinds of plastic. In Sweden we have one company that basically does all of the plastic recycling, "Swedish Plastic Recycling AB". They're currently building the world's largest plastic recycling plant in Sweden, Site Zero.

It's a mostly automated recycling plant that will be able to handle ALL of the plastic from the entire country and sort and recycle the following: PP, HDPE, LDPE, PET tray, PET bottles (colored and transparent), PP film, EPS, PS, PVC, two grades of Polyolefin mix, metal and non-plastic waste.


If this message resonated with you, feel free to take the post and expand upon it and by writing it better, providing more sources and making better arguments than I have. Then just paste it whenever the topic of trash is brought up.

view more: next ›