Lavitz

joined 10 months ago
[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You really think it's not ridiculous to point out how ridiculous it all is? There is value in calling out the elephant in the room however there's no value in validating Fox News and giving into the grift. That only benefits Fox News and Trump.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I fail to see how one impedes the other, in fact I would argue it would help her win. If she's running on doing just that why wouldn't she take a shot. Why hide? You think any Fox News fanboys would be swayed by anything Kamala says? Her time would be better spent attracting unregistered voters and she could do that by saying the quiet part out loud.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Being nice to idiots has proven to be hardly effective. Kamala needs to read word for word the arguments the Fox News lawyers made when they were in court for the dominion case. Fox News isn't news it's entertainment and they don't employ journalists they employ entertainers. This is what Fox News said.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Don't give Fox News respect. Start talking shit about it right now. Call this what it is, a scared old weird man who will only debate Harris on a "news" network currently paying billions for lying to everyone about the last election. Harris will treat Trump and the "journalists" playing moderators like children which is how we should've been treating them for years. Talking to them like adults validates their lies and bullshit.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 0 points 1 month ago

I think you're half correct. It's going to be Buttigieg. Not your average mayo and white bread guy but a mayo and white bread guy. It would make for a strong ticket with a lot of appeal. With the bonus of not having a contestable senate seat or governorship because he's currently a US secretary.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you think in order for people to not work their lives away we would have to take up subsistence farming? With all the tech and machines we have the only viable way to not be a company man is to give away all of the luxuries we currently have?

How's that Kool aid tasting?

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The dude mentioned a medical disability, stated he couldn't eat solid food or cook and you assume he can drive and then criticize him for delivery? He didn't spell out that he couldn't drive but it was pretty obvious if you read the post... Say sorry and move on buddy. You're in the wrong and look like an incel loser when you continue to double down.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 9 points 2 months ago

Right? Sounds like a great place to work. They'll be attracting the best and brightest with PR like this.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 1 points 2 months ago

Hey I'm just poking fun. That first comment was obviously a joke, you took it seriously so I ran with your logic and replied to you in the same way.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's why I did it! Did you read the comment you were responding to? Being applied to a completely different argument?

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 6 points 2 months ago

Right? I'm not sure if the tech industry is just going all in on the scam and trying to get as much of our money as they can or if we're actually about to have some kind of huge technological breakthrough.

[–] Lavitz@lemmings.world 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I would argue that while you're correct you're not 100% correct and overlooking a lot of nuances in history. If you want to look at it like that the empire fractured into two, there was a war and the winning side engulfed the other. None of the things you bring up as examples were accomplished with just unity and lobbying, all of these causes involved violence or the threat of violence. Don't go over simplifying history, a lot of people died for those rights. I by no means am advocating for these liars or violence but history has proven liars like this can be very dangerous and should not be laughed off.

 

Twice a week a pilot aborts a takeoff because other jets are entering an active runway. The FAA's solution is a 10 hour break between shifts rather than 9 hours.

 

What could go wrong?

view more: next ›