KeraKali

joined 1 year ago
[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 48 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Zero. Because the people who complain about woke will always be able to find something to complain about.

[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I fucking despise this and have sent it to several of my friends at light speed.

[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

This isn't a report, its just a statement that 85 percent of organizations think AI will cause job loss, along with other things like a new form of slavery and a war between AI and robots.

[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

When can we make this law?

[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 124 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

"According to US media, the post was made by a now-deleted account that regularly trolls the social media pages of the New York court system."

Hopefully this is true and nothing comes of it.

[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Spirit animal

[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

The love of a cat is truly something else. Until they get up and claw you half to death in the process.

[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago
[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 110 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (20 children)

“If the benefits do not meaningfully outweigh the risks, agencies should not use the AI,” the memo says. But the draft memo carves out an exemption for models that deal with national security and allows agencies to effectively issue themselves waivers if ending use of an AI model “would create an unacceptable impediment to critical agency operations.”

This tells me that nothing is going to change if people can just say their algoriths would make them too inefficient. Great sentiment but this loophole will make it useless.

[–] KeraKali@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Precious cat with literal murder mittens

 

Most of the time she's a goofball but every now and then I get a good picture

view more: next ›