Kbibble

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] Kbibble@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

You are not that person. You are you and this would be a decision you make, not some other person. The question is, do you feel like a simple label, controlled by someone else, able to shift from under your feet without your input, is capable of succinctly summing you up to another person? Is your life, your thoughts, your experiences, so capable of being put into such a box, to your satisfaction?

Or are you more dynamic, storied, multi-faceted, vibrant, and in charge of your own thoughts, than a single word defined by a perfect stranger, could possibly describe? And I don't mean your external self (visual appearance), I mean the person you are inside your own head.

I don't know you, but I'd prefer to think you're probably the latter...

But that's for you to decide.

[–] Kbibble@lemm.ee 10 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

Or abandon the political labeling system entirely and make it socially outdated by learning to confront someone labeling themselves by responding to them with something along the lines of: "Why would you allow someone else to tell you what it is you believe in? You don't get to decide what being a conservative/liberal means. Someone else decides that. You aren't part of it. So why would you let whoever that is tell you what you should think?"

Change the meaning of what it means to even use the labels and the weapon of using the labels to divide us no longer functions.

It has been dismantled, and they will have to come up with something else.

And just because they will eventually invent a new weapon, does not make it pointless. This is just the never ending metaphorical arms race we are all living in, but it gets easier once you see it for what it is.

[–] Kbibble@lemm.ee 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Perhaps it's best to make the distinction that this is creating a new type of predator, Violence Predators. Because that's what the problem is. Right now they are going after the targets no one cares about, when they run low on those targets, either because the need for "content/violence" outpaces the supply of easy targets, some of them will find new ones, while using the old label to mask what they are doing.

So make that distinction, because it's not about the people hunting pedophiles, it's about the people hunting for violence. If there's an overlap that doesn't need to be the focus of the argument, because that's the red herring.

[–] Kbibble@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Haha, yeah we had one of those cable boxes too and also used the switch box thing that would switch between the 1-60 and 60-120 channel range at one point. Fucking with analog devices was fun times.

I wasn't big into the cable porn though (I watched a lot of HBO standup on the box) cause I also grew up learning how to navigate warez sites and having to dodge porn popups (not always of course lol) to get my 52 part-zip files, each 15mb piece hosted on a different free geocities account, to recombine into GTA 1 and pray the link to piece #45 wasn't broken, lol.

[–] Kbibble@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Ok, for real this just helped me make sense of a whole mess of stressful shit running through my brain today. Thank you.

[–] Kbibble@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago

They all banked the first time he was president. It's all us regular people who got boned.