Illecors

joined 6 years ago
[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 months ago

This is put so beautifully!

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is this from some sort of q&a?

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 months ago

Oh yes, absolutely, to everything you've said. Every pixel on the matrix has to be wired up individually. My only argument would be that we've already reached ridiculous resolutions on phones - might as well plop a square sensor in.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What @dave@lemmy.nz said.

Although we could just use a square matrix.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago

I see you're shopping at tesco as well!

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 months ago

Point taken :D Coffee must kick in at some point.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I, personally, like a language being rich. Nothing wrong with not knowing all the ins and outs, but calling for simplification on what is already an very simple language is odd.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how any country's supreme court, other than Salvador's, could give any orders that would be followed in Salvador.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mini Metro was the first thing that came to mind. Fun little time waster.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 months ago

Mainframes have nothing to do with this.

RISCV is still just a computer - would work just fine on a logical level. Raw compute would be an issue with today's hardware.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 months ago

None of these would surprise me given ij baby/toddler context!

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 11 points 3 months ago

It does sound a bit like creating plausible deniability for some sketchy transactions later on.

view more: ‹ prev next ›