It's amazing how easily people seem to forget that machines uses tools its creator provides. You can't trust AI to be impartial because it never is as it is a collection of multiple choices made by people.
This is such a bore, having this same conversation over and over. Same thing happened with NFTs and whatever is currently at the height of its tech hype cycle. Don't buy into the hype and realize both AIs potential and shortcomings.
I do agree that technical mistakes are interesting but with AI the answer seems to always be creator bias. Whether it's incomplete training sets or (one-sidedly) moderated results, it doesn't really matter. It pushes the narrative to certain direction, and people trust AIs to be impartial because they presume it's just a machine that interprets reality when it never is.
Hey, at least it's a renewable source.
That's honestly an incredibly good solution.
Are you talking generally about emoji reactions or just when it comes to email?
There are probably some bitter etc. compounds that are just super strong. Like lemon smells nice but it alone might be a bit too much.
So it's the same story for Android?
It's what. A book, maybe book and a half per month? Like cool that it's an option but it's not really something makes a difference for me.
Well it's the same as with any document, digital or physical, that shows ownership. Obviously it being NFT wouldn't make it magically legit, same as with anything else.
But like I said I don't really see a point of that kind database being blockchain/NFT based anyway.
Could you describe a case example how that applies in practice?
Because yeah I understand that when we all have our own copy of the data someone can't falsify all our independent copies but is data being tampered like that even the problem?
Wasn't there a same kind of story out of Japan years ago? Murdered someone during their time Europe?