Cyteseer

joined 2 months ago
[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"ai" also has the advantage of billions of years of evolution.

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago

If they aren't willing to release it, then the situation is no different from them not having one at all. All these claims openai makes about having whatever system but hiding it, is just tobtry and increase hype to grab more investor money.

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

It's always been a big deal, it just died down as Photoshop as a tool became normalized and people became accustomed to it as a tool.

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

I personally am ok with the rounded corners since it makes it more ergonomic to handle. Part of why I got rid of my s22 ultra was the corners bit into my palm whenever I held it with one hand.

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

As a counterpoint to this articles counterpoint, yes, engineers should still be held responsible, as well as management and the systems that support negligent engineering decisions.

When they bring up structural engineers and anesthesiologists getting "blame" for a failure, when catastrophic failures occur, it's never blaming a single person but investigating the root cause of failures. Software engineers should be held to standards and the managers above them pressuring unsafe and rapid changes should also be held responsible.

Education for engineers include classes like ethics and at least at my school, graduating engineers take oaths to uphold integrity, standards, and obligations to humanity. For a long time, software engineering has been used for integral human and societal tools and systems, if a fuck up costs human lives, then the entire field needs to be reevaluated and held to that standard and responsibility.

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago

It's moreso, unless that tax debt is paid, you're never coming back to the US. Of course, some will say they never will.

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How would the original comment encourage either more HOA's or be considered libertarian? Weren't they asking for more regulations and the addition of tax repercussions to disincentivize rental properties?