CodeInvasion

joined 2 years ago
[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago

I prefer the 18th century Carl Von Clausewitz's definition of war:

War Is politics by other means

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_von_Clausewitz

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An LLC is a business. There's no other way around it. The IRS will revoke your LLC if you are not running it as a business or under protected non-profit clauses.

Don't take my word for it. Please consult with someone who has owned LLCs or even sole proprietorships for more than 5 years before charging ahead.

I've been running either an LLC or a sole proprietorship for 7 years, but I'm just random random internet person.

Also 1/3 of tax law are the actual words of any given law. The other 2/3 of tax law is executive interpretation/enforcement and case law from around the country.

There are some really interesting cases, even where tax lawyer firms get it wrong. In one instance a law firm tried to deduct their daily lunches as business meetings, and the tax court said no, even though it clearly states in the text of law that this is permissable. The judge basically said you can't declare a daily lunch as a business meeting.

Other court documents can be found here:

https://www.taxnotes.com/research/federal/court-documents

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You may want to read through this as well as some case law on the subject before jumping to conclusions.

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/heres-how-to-tell-the-difference-between-a-hobby-and-a-business-for-tax-purposes

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Not necessarily. You just need to demonstrate that you are running it like a for-profit company would, and with profit seeking motive.

Instead of a for-profit LLC, consider filing the business as a 501c charity.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely air traffic in the sky should be identified. There is no problem with that, but it's the idea that it is too easy to find out everything about an aircraft owner by simply seeing the number on their tail.

The rich guys obfuscate that info with shell corps to own the aircraft.

Shouldn't everyone have the right to the same level of privacy regardless of how much money they have?

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

No you cannot. You cannot easily find someone's address from looking at their plate. You need more information, or to do some advanced searching. It is simply not the same.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It is different because you typically need to know the municipality I live in first.

Also the registration allows anyone to track me anytime I fly.

How would you feel if you had a public gps transponder on your car publicly showing who you, where you are, and where you live? Also what if you are required to plaster that registration number on the side of your vehicle in large letters that can be seen from a block away?

It's a massive invasion of personal privacy.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Shitposters ride for free

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 60 points 3 months ago (17 children)

This is actually most helpful to the little guys that own $20,000 airplanes.

I have a small airplane and it's always bothered me that my name and address are publicly accessible through the FAA registry.

Most pilots I know are careful about photos they publish online showing their tail number printed in large bold letters on either side of the aircraft. This registration number can be entered into websites like flightaware.com and someone is literally two clicks from seeing my full name and home address.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Definitely, but I was more referring to this recent bout.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (17 children)

This is simply false.

The Houthis are not a state. There are a rebel faction in a civil war in Yemen.

Even if it were the Yemen government banning ships from it's waters it's can't do that by international law. They don't own the whole strait.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bab-el-Mandeb

Lastly, a UN resolution passed that outlaws this behavior.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_2722

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The US and international allies have been frequently attacking Houthi rebels since January 2024.

There were even memes about it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea_crisis

 

Aircraft’s last known position and speed show it climbing with decreasing speed. Based on the small loops shown, this was likely a training flight or proficiency check. It can be assumed the aircraft was placed into an intentional stall for training or VMC demo, but quickly departed controlled flight for an unknown reason. It was very windy in Massachusetts (up to 50 mph at altitude) and wind shear may have also been a factor.

According to online aviation blogs, those who knew the pilots say that two of the fatally injured occupants were experienced senior instructors.

https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/N7345R

view more: next ›