Those talking points don't feel humiliating to say in the context of the interview you're replying under?
Do you have human feelings?
AntiOutsideAktion
joined 2 months ago
Projection. Why would I care what you think? Do you care what I think? Is that why YOU'RE continuing to engage?
I'm replying to you because you're a dumb piece of shit and you shouldn't be allowed to troll an otherwise worthwhile discussion without being made to look like what you are. And good news: you look like a dumb piece of shit!
Try not to murder anyone with a drone on your way out, mister 'not' authoritarian.
Okay?
You accused someone of being a shill and I pointed out how much more likely (a lot) it is that you are a literal shill.
Congratulations on your toddler-esque ability to identify what was said. Thoughts?
This is a thread berating you into actually making an attempt at calling OP out that you couldn't rise to. You're aggrandizing yourself to the level of a troll and you can't even do that. By all means, call them out. But don't pretend your capable when you're not.
Well, considering we're replying to you being an obvious shill pushing the propaganda line that 'anyone who provides any information uncomfortable to my paymasters is a shill so don't listen to them' I would say that it's pretty obvious to anyone that you are the shill.
what does this reply have to do with the article or the admission contained therein besides having vaguely associated topic metadata tags, you bot?
You literally asked them to reply you
says the shill for a country that spends orders of magnitude more on propaganda and bots
On average, at least
systematic erasure of its population
You sound like a raving lunatic
wow you sure have been getting off a train for over ten minutes huh