this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
177 points (98.9% liked)

News

22651 readers
3273 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So once we get to fully half the nation have state legal cannabis.. can we please just legalize federally? I don’t even use the shit but this is just getting ridiculous watching every state ignore the feds on this issue and the feds not even saying anything

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Need 34 states to overcome the fillabuster.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ah so 3 or 4 more years. It was a sham after the 2nd state passed it and nothing happened from the feds

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What is taking you other states so long? There is a dispensary on my block and another one a five minute drive from me.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Republicans

[–] Brimos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They don’t want to give their excuse for locking up minorities…

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Curious how it would be handled by private businesses, who frequently drug test employees, would those sorts of tests still happen? Would it be sort of quasi-illegal, since failing a drug test might affect employment, or do those sorts of tests just go away? How has it played out in other states that have legalized it?

[–] Duranie@lemmy.film 10 points 1 year ago

I work for a hospital in Illinois. When recreational passed, we were sent notice that the hospital recognizes the legality, instructs (like with alcohol) that it's not to be used during your work hours, and that if you have reason to believe that your usage will interfere with your work, please speak to your manager about it.

[–] d4rknusw1ld@artemis.camp 3 points 1 year ago

They barely test for it in NJ anymore. State laws have protected users. I just took a test for a job was 10 panel - NO THC. In NJ they have to prove that you are impaired on work hours PLUS a positive test to take action. Just the test alone doesn’t work.

This doesn’t apply to federal positions… and placed with federal contracts can chose to ignore this.

CDL holders is still tested normally.

Even cops can use marijuana off duty in NJ.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 3 points 1 year ago

How has it played out in other states that have legalized it?

its still a mess but for the most part, businesses won't test for weed unless they have federal clients or another office in a non-legal state

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My company stopped testing for weed several years before it was legal in my city, once the neighboring state 5 minutes from our downtown legalized most of the business gave up enforcing thc tests. I’m sure the yokels continued to test but the cities gave up

[–] KaJedBear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's gonna depend on how each state phrases the law. It just became legal in Minnesota and the law specifically states that employers cannot discriminate against employees who test positive on a drug test, and employers would have to prove it was used on the job to terminate an employee.

Other states might leave provisions like that out, on purpose or otherwise.

[–] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

At least it'll make living in this glorious shithole a little bit more bareable.

[–] Parabola@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's "could" because it's a ballot initiative. If it doesn't happen, you can put the blame squarely on the voters.

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not entirely true - ballot initiatives in Ohio can be changed even after the voters approve it. So, for example, they could legalize, but then Ohio could change the bill to only legalize low potency products.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah but then we’d be ohigho and nobody wants that except for the people who hang out at the intersection of gay and high streets in Columbus /s

Added sarcasm tag because I’m an Ohioan who thought I was being clever. Seriously we’ve needed legal weed for years. Our medical cards are too restrictive as is.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

As an Ohighoan, choke on it