312
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Twitter, owned by Musk, fought for months for the right to tell Trump about Special Counsel Jack Smith’s search warrant for his account.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] athos77@kbin.social 103 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I've said this before, but Musk just never grew beyond adolescence. [Tesla models S3XY! 42069 amirite! Ligma! Tesla fart noises! hahahahaha!] Which is a real problem because he was raised as a socially-ignorant rich white boy in full-apartheid South Africa.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I dunno, S3XY is pretty fun and I could forgive all that cringy stuff if he wasn't such a fuckin narcissistic loser.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

It's only S3XY because Ford wouldn't let him make a Model E. It was going to be the far less creative SEXY originally. Meh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 89 points 10 months ago

Oh boy, the next few months are going to get exciting.

Initially, the government also claimed that another reason to keep the warrant a secret from Trump was the risk that he might flee the country, but the government later retracted that reason, saying it had been mistakenly included. Tellingly, the court agreed with this reason, as well, before the prosecutors retracted it as a mistake.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 66 points 10 months ago

The main reason is destroying evidence. This is a guy that would literally eat memos and flush paperwork down the toilet while in the white house.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago

You forgot that they (Trump's people, maybe Trump himself) repeatedly burnt government documents in the White House fireplaces.

[-] chaos@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

White House fireplaces

One of my favorite West Wing episodes

Mr. President, you know how you told me not to wake you unless the building is on fire?

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I love that episode

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Oh for sure, but if the judge thinks it's a possibility he could flee, that's interesting to me. I hope Smith gets that January court date and we'll know soon enough if he evades his secret service, lol.

[-] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I and at least literally 'ones' of others figured he'd be off to Russia or more likely Saudi Arabia as soon as he left office because he was scared shitless of being thrown in jail.

Now, naturally I'm a bit pissed he hasn't been held, at least on the Jan 6th charges, if not the damn espionage act indictment. "Two-tiered" justice, indeed.

[-] Hubi@feddit.de 14 points 10 months ago

I had always hoped that Trump would try to escape to Russia. It would've been the icing on the shit cake.

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Hanging out with Steven Seagal, riding around shirtless with Putin 😂

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I always picture him flying off on a propeller helicopter gadget thing, laughing.

[-] mikeboltonshair@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

“Eat memos *covered in Big Mac™️ sauce”

[-] hogunner@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

I’ve been convinced for a while now that if Trump felt he was actually headed to jail his last desperate act would be to try to flee to North Korea to hide behind his crazy bestie Kim (who would absolutely love the drama of having an ex-POTUS as his puppet to parade around and try to shame the US with).

[-] Godric@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Nah, he'd go for Russia. Not enough diet Coke or well done-steaks with ketchup for Donnie in NK.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe Saudi Arabia. Russia's too cold.

[-] hogunner@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I don’t doubt that Trump would want to go to Russia but Putin would never agree to that when he could have all the same benefits if Donnie was in NK and none of the negatives of having him in Russia. Kim is crazy enough that he wouldn’t care and would enjoy all the extra scrutiny and attention.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] QHC@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

How long would Trump actually survive if he lived in North Korea? Do they have McDonalds and Diet Coke?

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You do know that just because a country is poor doesn't mean the upper crust can't scrounge enough money to buy a cheese burger right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QHC@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I wonder why the prosecution team thought that was a "mistake", or if it was intentionally included and then retracted? Maybe it's standard language?

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

Not a lawyer but lawyers write draft arguments and then choose the ones they think are the best. It's possible they put the flight risk argument in a draft but ultimately decided to remove it, but then sent it out before actually removing it.

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I'm not a lawyer but my guess is that they didn't want a court fight about it when their best reason was enough.

[-] MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

The "standard language" thing sounds right to me. A lot of court filings templates and attorneys just plug in the facts for their particular submission.

Which unfortunately reminds me of Mad Libs, and now this is all getting pretty absurd in my head

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I think being under constant secret service protection would make it hard to flee the country. They'd have to go along with it.

[-] QHC@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Is that mandatory? Pretty sure it's a service offered to former Presidents, but Trump could probably just say no.

He hasn't (and probably won't) do that because he likes feeling important, and because he ain't paying for their services.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

They can refuse it. Trump would be too scared to.

[-] Elderos@lemmings.world 36 points 10 months ago

There is a lot to hate in that pic.

Crazy how coke and aderall make these 2 morons believe they should get to decide what direction the planet spin.

Why people worship idiots born in wealth will always be beyond me. If any of you ever suffered imposter symdrome, think of this picture in the thumbnail.

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 5 points 10 months ago

And ketamine. Don't forget the ketamine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 25 points 10 months ago

Shit birds of a feather shit together.

[-] thatguydude@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago
[-] MichaelScarn@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

The shit apples don’t fall far from the shit tree

[-] MisterMoo@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago

Because Elon Musk is just Donald Trump with business sense. I get roasted every time I say this, but I've never been more sure of anything in my life.

[-] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 28 points 10 months ago

Not sure Elon has that either. Both morons.

[-] lasagna@programming.dev 26 points 10 months ago

Elon Musk is a lottery winner in the business world.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Is ketamine the new cocaine?

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago

Lol, Musk has had his bad ideas shot down since he tried to rename PayPal to "X". He was just lucky enough to buy valuable companies and have capable people stop him from ruining them with his terrible ideas.

I honestly think if you gave a random person a billion dollars and told them to buy a company to run they could do just as well as Musk

[-] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not roasting, but don't really agree. I mean, look at what's left of twitter. He was never directly controlling Tesla and certainly not SpaceX, just had the money, practiced bullshit artistry, and made specific orders if it suited him.

I can almost certainly thank him for the ability to make my car fart from my phone, but that's about it.*

*Disclaimer: Comment author (hereby "jerkface") fully acknowledges jerkface has no insider experience in the Tesla product pipeline, and jerkface carries hopeful bias in that Musk has very little to do with the success of Tesla in order to assuage jerkface's emotional guilt for loving the absolute shit out of jerkface's Model 3 Performance because it's awesome.

Edit-crap, no superscript with ^ I guess.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

"Twitter went to court because it wanted to tell Trump about the request despite the court-ordered secrecy."

[-] visak@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Musk told him. I guarantee it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
312 points (97.0% liked)

News

21676 readers
3006 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS