Dolphin didn't attempt to monetize the emulator, it was being released for free as it has always been.
What are you talking about?
You are also talking like its dead or something. No, it is not nearly like that.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Dolphin didn't attempt to monetize the emulator, it was being released for free as it has always been.
What are you talking about?
You are also talking like its dead or something. No, it is not nearly like that.
Ah, my mistake, I could have swore they had said somewhere they were going to charge for it.
Still, putting it up on Steam even for free when talking about something related to Nintendo seems like wishful thinking.
Just to note, the issue with Dolphin was that they had copyrighted decryption keys in their source code, which is why they were pulled from Steam.
But Nothing CEO told me there are no privacy concerns, everything is stored on my device. Could it have been a marketing trick? I thought we should trust CEO-bros blindly.
Edit Aaaand they removed the video.
The guys just a conartist one of the reasons I bought the Nothing phone 1 was the remarks no other phone would be on the horizon for a long time until they nailed it.
About 2 months later phone 2 is the only one the company cares about and every phone 1 update seems buggier and more rushed than the last.
I expect the same will happen to anyone with phone 2 when they inevitably spring a 3 out of nowhere.
I’m very not into tech or savvy, but this was a glaring red flag to me. Can’t believe they got as far as they did with the idea.
If you're talking about the whole thing with dolphin almost being released on steam, it wasn't going to cost money. They weren't trying to monetize. They were just trying to have the download available on steam
Ah, my mistake, I could have swore they had said somewhere they were going to charge for it.
Still, putting it up on Steam even for free when talking about something related to Nintendo seems like wishful thinking.
Isn't it interesting how when you knowingly release an insecure product, people have security concerns.
I've said for the longest time, Apple could put iMessage on Android, charge for it, and make plenty of money (mine included). So I was very intrigued by Sunbird! But I took one look at Sunbird's website and knew something was wrong. Maybe it was the lack of a clear idea for how they'll make money or that they didn't initially disclose the technology behind it.
Suffice to say: I am not surprised by this.
Good
It was a pretty bad idea, not only a privacy risk for users but for anyone those users interact with. You no longer get the guarantee that your iMessages are end to end encrypted since anyone using the service puts a man in the middle for everyone they communicate with.
It's crazy that anyone allowed Nothing to move forward and announce their integration, while sunbird had to know this was an open risk. what a joke.
deleted
Its gotta be accessible somehow. What difference does it make if its accessible via the web or not?
Does anyone mod reposts ? This must have been posted 4 or 5 times now