this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
113 points (89.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53843 readers
574 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For context, I want to run a small personal gig (offering stuff on Patreon). Nothing too fancy.

In order to do that, I would need to use the Adobe suite, Windows, some audio and video effects, all requiring a commercial license.

In theory, I start to make money. How would Microsoft and Adobe know that I don't pay for their software?

If I use some audio effects, how would their owners even be able to tell / find my work? We're talking about basic sound effect, like rain, door knocks etc.

I've always been confused by this

(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 3 points 10 months ago

In theory, some busybody would have to report you for it.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's encoded into the file itself which license you have

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Instead of Photoshop, use GIMP. Instead of Premiere, use Da Vinci Resolve. Instead of After Effects, use Blender. Instead of Audtion, use Audacity.

[–] NuclearWeapon@ioc.exchange 0 points 10 months ago

@dangblingus @shadowagent Instead of Audition, use Reaper

[–] jet@hackertalks.com -4 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Your clients might be performing due diligence and ask you for copies of your licenses. Especially if they're in a jurisdiction that's more litigious than others

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›