Like your grandma's Facebook feed.
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
15 points (89.5% liked)
Ask Lemmy
33079 readers
4423 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I suppose like it did before news orgs were a thing. So, like how it was about 200+ years ago?
Basically rumors and gossip like those spread in social media.
Is this a "what happens if we outlaw all News Organizations" situation, or a "What if the world evolved without News Organizations" scenario?
From there, the answer depends entirely on how you define "news" and "organization."
Nobody would define aunt Sharon gossiping about her neighbor's cat's digestive issues as being a "news organization." Almost everybody would define the New York Times, or CNN as one.
Between them lies a million shades of gray, and any distinction is going to be arbitrary.
In the "outlaw" scenario above, even the best attempts to define clear and unambiguous rules will just lead to gamesmanship and disappointment.
People want news. It's a need as primitive as gossip. In fact, gossip is probably the answer to your question. But gossip is neither fast nor reliable, so people will inevitably invent news organizations to satisfy the need, as much as we have invented agriculture to satisfy our need to eat.
Perhaps when you say "news organizations" you intend a much more narrow definition, like maybe a "privately owned news organization"? That's a dramatically different question though.
1500 and prior
We would have to go a long way back, before religions became the first worldwide media outlets. Hard to imagine how we would do in a Neanderthal world. Must have been rad.