this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
408 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

72350 readers
6687 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 91 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

USA could have spent money developing an electrified economy but the republicans are focusing on bringing back coal mining and reshoring shoe manufacturing instead.

This admin has set the USA back 100 years.

ETA - what I mean is that China is rampaging on in electrification, developing manufacturing skills, infrastructure, and design/engineering/technology around renewables and electrification. Europe is thinking about it but not going crazy to the extent China is, because legacy - China doesn’t have 100 years of cars and 150 years of trains; they’re building new. USA meanwhile is actively regressing under Republican policies.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Especially when you see some of the tech being rocked in Asian cities

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which kind of blows my mind. Coal miners should love EVs. There was a story in the news a few years ago about how nice it was for the miners to help someone in an EV, as if they should be mortal enemies.

Non-EV cars don't run on coal, they run on gasoline. EVs on the other hand can run on coal, natural gas, solar, wind, you name it - and still are more energy efficient than cars burning gasoline. In a sane world, coal miners would be throwing their support behind electric vehicles. The utility companies seem to understand this, but seems like the support hasn't made its way up the supply chain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

But… but… those good ol’ days felt so good! We need to relive those days!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

This admin has set the USA back 100 years.

Again. They already enshrined "billionaires get all the money" in the one legislative victory of trumps first term.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago (10 children)

i hate musk, but i am not wild about our dependence on china either, so i am not really sure who to root for in this fight...

[–] SpaceRanger13@lemm.ee 64 points 1 week ago (16 children)

I would say go with whatever company that doesn't have a CEO throwing Nazi salutes.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, the Chinese manufacturers are out to make money, and at least we know what to expect from them.

Besides, being profitable usually means making a better product than your competitors.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (7 children)

GASP!

You mean... Proper capitalism!?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Root for better public transport and active cities instead of car dependency :)

[–] StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The public transport bus I take to and from work is a Chinese made electric. It's a Yutong E15.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (18 children)

Competition is good for the consumer. More options from more players will encourage more charging infrastructure and (ostensibly) more innovation. It's not just Elon Musk vs China. Every automaker that wants to sell cars in the USA is on notice. If they want to compete in the EV subcategory, they need to focus on price and performance. People want budget-conscious EVs.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Everywhere is depndent on China, buy the car that isnt overtly a fascist car. They also suck.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even before the current political situation I wouldn't have bought a Tesla. They have a documented quality problem and not very good customer service at least outside of the US.

Why would I buy a car that is not only more likely than most to break but when it does break it's hard to get fixed. Spare parts are notoriously hard to get hold of and you usually have to deal with Tesla directly which is a problem because they don't have a lot of dealerships in the UK. Also they won't come to you, so if your car won't start you have to arrange a pickup.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have terrible customer service in the US too. I think it's their business model: find people who enjoy being treated like an asshole and sell them overpriced shit.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

So like Apple but more expensive

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I used to like and look up to SpaceX for the interesting stuff that they build,

but nowadays i don't care anymore. The company can fail for all i care. Musk spoiled it.

The tipping point, for me personally, was when Musk seriously threatened to slash public spending in February this year. It shows a clear disrespect to the people, and frankly, a sociopathic attitude.

Musk had everything, lots of money, lots of fame, lots of influence, but he threw it all away when he decided to threaten the wellbeing and lifelyhood of a lot of people just so that rich assholes can make an extra buck through tax cuts.

He's basically gutting NASA so it can be reduced to a taxpayer-funded corporate subsidy for greedy billionaires and giant corps. They're killing everyone's dreams and inspiration.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder what continues to motivate the uber rich to seek more wealth-you simply can't buy any more tangible amount of happiness through material or influence after a point.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Once you have enough money, anything you do makes you money.

Elon blew 44 billion or Twitter, axed the servers, staff, and the name, and he was able to leverage that into a government job where he could kill investigations into his companies years later. You could say it's intelligence, but I'd say it's a combination of luck, and the resources to blow 44 billion and not have it affect you personally in any way.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is one of the reason that the USA being heavy handed with Chinese is going to bite us in the ass. While in the USA, we bury our heads in the sand and GM, Tesla and etc. all crank out $95,000 giant trucks/SUVs, some companies in China are making very, very affordable vehicles. These aren't necessarily garbage either -- there's models available for almost any price point.

What WOULD be really smart and forward thinking is if in the USA, the domestic brands also make some affordable models to get EV more popular. However, they are addicted to fat profit margins, and thanks to all the protectionism, they don't need to worry about offshore models being "better".

While other nations either develop and/or import affordable EVs, we're effectively banning them. This is all going to end up with a giant wake up call for American auto-manufacturers when the protections/tariffs are ultimately lifted and they HAVE to compete.

I think it would be great if the tariffs came with huge incentives for domestic manufacturers and motivated them to be competitive. Instead, it's just letting them segment the market for a few years and make a killing. Who loses? The people...

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

These cars are passing EU safety tests which are generally more demanding than the USA.

They are definitely getting good, fast.

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Not just people, the economy will end up paying the price.

Tariffs have horrible second order effects.

Every companies outputs is some other companies inputs.

American companies end up locked out of more affordable vehicles as inputs. That cost then gets baked into its output, which is some other company’s input. Then just keep following that chain.

The best broad blanket tariffs can hope to do is trade long term competitiveness for some short term price increase.

Americans will wonder why other nations eat our lunch in the coming decades. Well that foreign company could buy the cheaper machine to produce the widget, their raw materials cost less to deliver because the transit company that ships it in charges a better rate because they have lower vehicle overhead. Since they have 2 dozen suppliers for their components both foreign and domestic they are forced to compete on quality and price.

American companies will become even more bloated and inefficient

This is the real reason for tarrifs. Forcing citizens into paying ridiculous prices so biliionares can circle jerk about how much more power they can get. They're scourges and bottomless voids of resources and misery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

as customers switch to Chinese EVs

Sure. That's the reason.

[–] killabeezio@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago (13 children)

I don't think that's what they meant. I think they are just saying that people are still buying EVs, but they are just going to Chinese and other manufacturers instead of buying a Tesla. The article specifically calls out the stupid shit Elon has been doing.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

Which is important because about a year ago the headlines were saying EV sales were collapsing. In fact, it was just Tesla having less market share of new EVs sold because other manufacturers got off their ass.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

And in the US we just block foreign options because it is gov policy to artificially support specific corporations.

[–] Pirate@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

Chinese electric cars are just better. BYD is what Tesla wanted to be, but actually fulfills its promises. Plus it isn't ran by a nazi dictator.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] 3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com 6 points 1 week ago

Here in the UK Musk is just seen as an idiot. Some decent European EV solutions coming along but the Chinese cars are so much better value than Tesla OR the main European makes. Couldn't happen to a nicer megalomaniac and as a plus I love seeing the monthly SpaceX explosions

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Looking forward to Tesla reporting Q2 earnings next month. I assume another round of disastrous numbers paired up with some vaporware distraction. Perhaps they can keep this charade going, but at some point reality will catch up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago
[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Did not zee this happening.

load more comments
view more: next ›