this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
656 points (94.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

24143 readers
2388 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbraroze@piefed.social 116 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Documentation is like sex: You're not getting any"

[–] FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Damn haha, this made me laugh out loud

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

This meme was made by someone who has never had truly bad sex/documentation.

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yup, op has never had the joy of the docs lying to them.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is getting a face full of pussy that stinks like a litter box better than no pussy at all? 🤔

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Good example! My point exactly!

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I've had to use outdated documentation that made the problem worse. So I guess bad documentation is like bad, unprotected sex with a lot lizard that leaves you with an itching or burning sensation.

I've been there... (In a work/corporate context, at least)

I'll leave 'the night work' out of it, however (damn, the glitter gets everywhere!)

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 39 points 6 days ago

Completely incorrect - bad documentation can be actively harmful, wasting your time with its inaccuracies.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Respectfully disagree. Sometimes the documentation is so bad that you have more questions than answers and even then, what they provide still doesn't really explain how to do something with enough details. It's all literally shot in the dark and you're just left with leap of faith. * cough * Sonicwall * cough *

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Last week I spent a day trying to figure out why the thing in the damn documentation doesn't work.

Turns out, for that project "latest" doesn't point to their latest release, but to what they currently have on their dev branch. And apparently they changed the whole module around since the last release.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Then you haven’t seen bad documentation (or had that sex you regret).

[–] FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

In general it’s supposed to be something good so it shouldn’t be harmful, but ofc exceptions exist, especially with sex, sadly…

Bad often equals "not super good" in this context

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Incidentally, both bad sex and code documentation both involve std vectors.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 2 points 6 days ago

It's fine, babe, the doctor said I've got a standard.

[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Bad documentation could land you in prison.

Bad sex is just horrible all around.

not sure what this post is on about

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I would say bad sex can land you in a prison too.

[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

When it’s really bad, it can be far worse than nothing.

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 12 points 6 days ago (4 children)

As an asexual person this anology is very confusing

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

As an asexual person, you get just as much sex as most developers get documentation.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe it can be translated into something else, like, "Documentation is like toilet paper, when it's good it's good, when it's bad it's better than nothing"? Or, "Documentation is like clothes, even if they are bad it's better than nothing", or "Documentation is like having something you need, it's better to have the thing you need even if is not good, than to not have the thing you need at all"?

[–] Jiggs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

I like the analogy with toilet paper. Because when its bad, the very thing that was supposed to help you, got you covered in shit with no back out plan, making it that much worse.

Very fitting

As a sexual person, I agree

[–] andioop@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Also asexual.

Just consider most people really like sex, and some experience it as a very intense physical want to the point it makes sense that a bad version of it is better than none at all. Sort of similar to food. Better to have bad-tasting food and at least sate your hunger than to have nothing and starve.

Although, of course, it breaks down. The comments talk about actively harmful sex people wouldn't want as well as harmful documentation; bad sex and documentation is not actually always better than no sex or no documentation. In the analogy, this would be sex that gives you an STD, or documentation that sends you running in circles and misleads you.

I've found a lot of understanding sex comes with just understanding a lot of people really really want it and experience it as a nigh-on need. Maybe liken it to some intense desires you have, things you need to be happy that you nonetheless don't need to survive. (Of course, this is a generalization, I understand not all people with sexual desires have them this intensely. Some don't need it to be happy but would sure like it a lot. And some might even get it more mildly. But for the purpose of understanding more mainstream jokes, analogies, etc. about sex…)

What about when the sex is ... wrong?

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

When it's bad, it's life changing in a traumatic way.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Bro has never been at /moma

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

When documentation is missing critical bits of information I don't know if its better than nothing. Spend ages and then have to raise a ticket saying its a bug because its not working as documented, when no documentation would have just been an instant ticket raised asking how its supposed to work. Because it turns out everything was working correctly and the customer had just set something up wrong but there was no documentation covering that bit so according to what we had, all looked good.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago

Deal, I've got plenty of small hobby projects that can use some!

[–] capybara@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

What if the documentation is wrong?

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What about rape? Is that just chatgpt reworded documentation?

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh dang, how long until some company just feeds their entire codebase into an llm and calls it documentation?

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

I guarantee it's already happened. The question is when a company large enough that you can't avoid it follows suit.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 4 points 6 days ago

When something like python tries to force readability into your code without your consent?

That's why I always use a nonsensical class structure with stupid names; it's my chastity belt.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

There's this cool program called qalc. I stumble on to cool features in it that's not even listed in the documentation.

load more comments
view more: next ›