this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
216 points (98.2% liked)

xkcd

11062 readers
13 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
216
xkcd #3095: Archaea (imgs.xkcd.com)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by xkcdbot@lemmy.world to c/xkcd@lemmy.world
 

xkcd #3095: Archaea

Title text:

Under the two-domain system, anyone who punches you is technically an Archaean pathogen.

Transcript:

[Cueball, Megan, and White Hat are standing in a lab in front of a root-like phylogeny diagram, looking at it. Behind them is a desk with a microscope on it. There is a pile of items behind it and one item in front. From the plate on the microscope where the sample is, there is a star burst and a line going up to the text said by the sample.]
Cueball: It's weird how, despite being one of the main branches of the tree of life, no Archaea species are known to cause disease in humans.
Megan: Personally, I think it's because those gross methane breathers are too weird and incompetent to figure out how to hurt us even if they wanted to.
Archaea sample: Hey!

[Caption below the panel:]
Bad news: After overhearing a conversation in our lab, Archaea has finally started harming humans.

Source: https://xkcd.com/3095/

explainxkcd for #3095

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SattaRIP@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I asked my professor about this. He said there are hypotheses, but no conclusion. The most likely explanation , he said, might have something to do with archaea being closer to us than bacteria in the evolutionary tree.

[–] lemming@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

But there are eukayotic parasites. They are even closer to us. This on its own is not an explanation.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I was wondering if it maybe has to do with the ecological niche of many of these archaea. They have evolved to live in conditions that are simply not accessible to other organisms which means they have no need to defend their nutrient sources/live off other organisms. Just a thought though

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

they probably dont produce toxins that harm humans in our gut, or skin, or nasal biomes like bacteria. also furhtermore bacteria have other ways to infiltrate cells

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Do archea harm other mammals? Other vertabrates? Other animals? Other eukaryotes? As far as I can tell they don’t.

Why is it a suprise they don’t harm humans?

Also this meme is a bit weird. Because eukaryotes (so animals, plants and fungi) technically evolved from Archea. So if we apply classification biology logic we are Archea. And eukayotes do cause diseases in each other ie. parasitic worms.

But in practice in english Archea excludes the eukaryotic branch.