this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
51 points (98.1% liked)

Nintendo

19870 readers
239 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
  8. Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Mario Kart World [S2] | Jun 05 Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour [S2] | Jun 05 Donkey Kong Bananza [S2] | Jul 17 Drag x Drive [S2] | 2025 Hyrule Warriors: Age of Imprisonment [S2] | 2025 Kirby Air Riders [S2] | 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025 Pokémon Z-A | 2025 The Duskbloods [S2] | 2026 Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream | 2026

[S2] means Switch 2 only.

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We finally hear from Doug Bowser!

On the pricing:

“What you see right there is variable pricing,” Bowser told The Washington Post. “We’ll look at each game, really look at the development that’s gone into the game, the breadth and depth of the gameplay, if you will, the durability over time and the repeatability of gameplay experiences.

On Nintendo Switch:

Bowser said Nintendo remains committed to selling the first Switch console. Four years ago, in our first conversation, Bowser said the Switch is “redefining what a console cycle can look like.”

“Now I even wonder what is the definition of a console cycle,” Bowser said. “We’ll continue to keep Nintendo Switch as part of the family, giving consumers a number of different entry points that they can come into the gaming universe.”

(...)

“What I would say is that we’ll continue to observe consumers and how they engage and enter into the platform at various levels to try to really understand what the future may look like,” Bowser said. “Here’s the other point. We have an install base [for the Switch] of 150 million plus units. We’ll probably announce more on May 8 when we have our next earnings call. We want to keep those players engaged. Not all of them may be ready to jump to Switch 2.”

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunkiBas@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago

I thought I was reading the onion for a second there, had to do a double take. Bowser is an insufferable idiot.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

My body is not ready.

Sorry Doug I guess you were the villain as your namesake after all.

[–] GreatRam@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

But what does Reggie think?

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

“We’ll look at each game, really look at the development that’s gone into the game, the breadth and depth of the gameplay, if you will, the durability over time and the repeatability of gameplay experiences.

idk what better explanation you could expect. He's very clearly explaining the reasons here and you're all being hysterical about it.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It sounds like it comes straight from a "how to take as much money from your fans as possible" talk.

A better explanation would be "because we want your money".

[–] I3lackshirts94@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

No it doesn’t sound like that 😂 You couldn’t say it any better than that. If you take what he is saying with what you know, it actually does make sense why tears of the kingdom is $70 over the normal $60 at the time.

It’s easy to say that it’s expensive until reviews are out or you play it. I can at least respect the quote because it’s holding up to be true with what they have done, but is it really worth a $20 increase? I guess time will tell.

TotK was worth the $10 for the exact reason he is talking about.

[–] tflyghtz@lemm.ee 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean to be fair. 60$ in 2017 are like 75$ now.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And game prices haven't been going up for a long time. Not that I want them to, but the fact of life is that the production cost for games are way higher now, while their prices are not. Everything else is getting more expensive. I'm not saying it's not sustainable, but I understand that these companies want to make money, not just keep themselves afloat.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I see this argument a lot and it entirely glosses over the fact that the market is at least one order of magnitude larger, possibly two.

The cost of a game is the development, marketing, maintenance to some degree and in some cases physical production of the medium.

Past that it's gravy.

You charge 70 in the 1990's times 100,000 sales vs charging 70 now to a million sales.

It's not like producing a car where you have a fixed unit cost, this is mostly copying already made data.

Yes, the tertiary costs can go up and the development costs can go up but the addressable market has also gone up significantly.

Nintendo specifically is absolutely not living release to release and is the worst possible example for this argument.

Not only do they not really do sales but they also have DLC all the way up the wazoo and frequently rerelease old games at current market prices, with minor tweaks.

They do not, however, lean all the way in to microtransactions, which is nice

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

I can't really disagree with any point you've made here.

[–] Hellahunter@lemmy.world 31 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

So basically Nintendo fans need to vote with their wallet or gaming is about to get really expensive for us all.

[–] Harlehatschi@lemmy.ml 19 points 10 hours ago

Nintendo fans will vote just like Apple Fans.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Unfortunately.... Gomo, and the switch 2 will sell out instantly and Mario kart will also sell out instantley

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

That's generally how luxury pricing works, yes.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, were looking at game "durability"? So, when I can beat the next Mario game in a few hours, does that mean it's only gonna be $20? No? You're just making up excuses for increasing the price of games? Right.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Good point. Dude says it's "variable" pricing, so if MKW, being an online multiplayer racing game that theoretically could have unlimited play time for many players, then a single player game with only about 40 hours average gameplay should be hella cheap by comparison, right?

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 hours ago

Well, DK Bananza IS cheaper indeed

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 hours ago

Don't forget that you have to pay for a subscription to play online, which is one of the reasons the game is playing for a long time.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 hours ago

“We’ll continue to keep Nintendo Switch as part of the family, giving consumers a number of different entry points that they can come into the gaming universe.”

What a unique and novel concept they’ve never tried before.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I am conflicted about the $80 price tag for MKW, but Nintendo already do variable pricing, it has games for 40 and 50, and now it seems they are going to try the 80 price range too.

And as always, vote with your wallets!

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

One thing you can always count on is NVIDIA, Apple, and Nintendo fans to let you down when it comes to voting with their wallets.

[–] ladel@feddit.uk 6 points 9 hours ago

In my mind, all it boils down to is that Nintendo think that they can charge that much and would like us to believe it's worth it. Whether it is worth it is subjective and up to each individual. Most of us will probably be tighter with our choices in some way.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Bowser, boss of Nintendo...

[–] sdcSpade@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago

the durability over time and the repeatability of gameplay experiences.

Looks like the "1$ per hour of gameplay" crowd is finally getting what they wanted.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

In a nutshell: We're going to charge as much as you fucks are willing to pay.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 8 hours ago

Parasite justifies its existence

Deny it profit!