this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
1390 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

22285 readers
909 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

spinning up new tech startup: nah forget it. you don't even have to watch videos

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 248 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"Ok, so what you can see in the logs?"

"Sweetcorn."

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 55 points 1 week ago

Didn't ingest any, but it's still there somehow

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] elrecoal19_1@lemmy.world 223 points 1 week ago (22 children)
[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 127 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Don’t put the gun within reach of the printer, come on

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The more I hear from big tech companies the more I want to reject it. I don't even own a printer.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago (24 children)

Go for older laser printers. They’re bulletproof, cheap on toner, free of DRM, and even if they only come with an LPT port you can always build your own print server that gives you all the bells and whistles like AirPrint.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 197 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can consider acceptable for the kettles to be connected to the internet if, and only if, they answer always with a 418 status code.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'm perfectly fine with enabling a connection, just not requiring one.

For example - my lights are automated. They have a switch though. If they went offline (or my server does), I can press the entirely local switch and have light.

As a reminder though, 418 is supposed to be the response for requests of the teapot to brew coffee.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 151 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If it doesn't work well without the Internet, it's a bad investment. Features that require the Internet degrading a bit is one thing, but if a toilet or toaster can't do its basic job offline, it was ewaste the second it rolled off the factory line.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Same goes for games BTW

Fuck online requirements

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 76 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The difference between an IT person and a tech enthusiast

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Making "smart" devices that can't do routine mundane things without an active internet connection is completely fucking stupid.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 60 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

My sister's new apartment's front door has a "smart lock", hooked up to Ring, naturally. No keyhole, you open it with your phone. It also runs on batteries.

Do I really need to say any more? We were baffled.

EDIT: Correction - there IS a keyhole but the actual tenants don't have access to it. Only the property management. Creepy. :|

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Time for her to learn lockpicking I'd say.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] contrapunctus@lemmy.cafe 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair.

Douglas Adams

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Douglas Adams was a huge fan of Apple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] forkradiofact@lemm.ee 49 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Has nobody else pointed out this is clearly not real?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago

I honestly could not tell. It's completely believable that something this stupid would exist. Like I didn't necessarily believe it was but I wasn't confident in either direction.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, strong Doubt (X) on this one

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SGG@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I've put a few smart lights/switches/sensors/power points in at home. Definitely helps mum as we can have wireless switches for the lights, and motion sensors to turn the hallway lights on automatically as well.

For ALL of them, I make sure there is a manual control that will work as a backup regardless. Even if a smart light is "off" due to the motion sensor not detecting movement, all you need to do is turn the old regular light switch off then back on and the light will default to being back on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The fact that everything is controlled through "The Cloud" and some godforsaken subscription service is so terribly sad, funny, and horrifying at the same time. We've literally found every conceivable way to gather and sell people's data while simultaneously milking them out of every last cent with the whole FOMO mentality driven through every piece of hardware and software now sold. It is just absolutely fucking preposterous. We're living in a virtual hellscape that doesn't seem to be going away anytime soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Anything in my house smarter than the IKEA remote control light switch gets crushed with a hammer.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I mean, you could just use smarter stuff that's open source and has local API, or do what I do and build your own devices where you can ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (38 children)

Even there though, what is the actual point of a phone app controlled smart toilet, even if you open sourced the whole thing? Unlocking one's phone and tapping the app icon, and then presumably a button on the app, is going to take more time than one press of a lever that one is right next to anyway, and the latter doesn't present as many points of failure.

load more comments (38 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Michal@programming.dev 40 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Who buys a toilet you can only flush with an app??

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think any of these people know what "smart" is supposed to mean cause these must be the dumbest ideas for any product I've heard so far.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago

'Smart' means it can send your lifestyle data to the company, and make you dependent on their services.

You want to change your toilet provider? Best of luck holding your poo in for three days while the transfer is processed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments