this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
58 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

58369 readers
4274 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

‘Put learners first’: Unesco calls for global ban on smartphones in schools::Major UN report issues warning over excessive use, with one in six countries already banning the devices

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rizoid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My son always has his phone at school. Given how America is I wouldn't send him to school without a way to get a hold of me.

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The issue is that smartphones have features that are way more interesting than school. Can you send your kid to school with a simple phone that can only make calls and send and receive SMS?

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You could, but in reality you should have the parenting ability to trust your kid not to be constantly on their phone in school. If you can't trust your kid to stay off their phone during class and only use it during breaks, lunch, after or before school, etc. Then you've failed as a parent.

[–] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was a high schooler last year and by this standard, every single one of my classmates' parents are complete failures, including mine. Not that I disagree, but clearly we can't trust the parents to do anything about this.

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Because this is not about trust. Don't overestimate your or your kid's contribution. Our brains seek to use as little energy and effort as possible, always. The right strategy is to reduce the amount of distracting factors in school.

[–] baked_tea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah because most of our parents are trash at it and make kids because "that's what people do"

[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Do “good parents” really all have this level of robotic control over their kids?

Do you really give a zero to “nature” in the nature vs. nurture behavioral influence?

[–] db2@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the abuses that have been brought to light because there's a way to do so?

I would call that a dilemma, I guess.

[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I used a PalmOS device in school to manage my school schedule. So this was my 1st thought:

“Banning mobile phones entirely from school premises would raise some practical concerns, for example for parents wanting to contact their children while travelling between school and home.”

Feature phones still exist. It would be great if the massive stockpiles of prematurely discarded dumbphones could be recycled to students. Maybe bring back offline PalmOS types of things for scheduling.

“…Some pupils will also use phones as payment methods on public transport.”*

Easily solved: smartphones go into the locker at the start of the day. Also, bring back the ability to pay cash on the public transport vehicle -- this will help push back on the #warOnCash. We could also say there’s a systemic inefficiency if students don’t have season passes on public transport.

[–] silberwoelfin@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Putting lots of Smartphones into lockers will probably lead to even more lockers being broken into... those things aren`t exactly safes. Also, not every school everywhere actually has lockers.

[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I would bet it’s a slim enough minority of students who pay public transport on a per-trip basis that theft would not be from arbitrary break ins. A student would have to (recklessly?) use a high-end phone for this & be spotted putting an uncovered phone in the locker.

The best security is a good insurance policy. Not sure if high-end phones tend to have an insurance policy because I avoid them myself.

[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lol.. I see that the Facebook-addicted kids are down-voting me :) Probably as they sit in a boring class!

load more comments
view more: next ›