this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
249 points (98.4% liked)

Europe

5078 readers
1825 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: https://archive.is/2025.03.19-115656/https://www.ft.com/content/eb9e0ddc-8606-46f5-8758-a1b8beae14f1

The planned fund for capitals to spend on weapons would only be open to EU defence companies and those from third countries that have signed defence agreements with the bloc, officials said on Wednesday.

It would also exclude any advanced weapons systems upon which a third country had “design authority” — restrictions on its construction or use of particular components — or control over its eventual use, the officials added. 

That would exclude the US Patriot air and missile defence platform, which is manufactured by defence contractor RTX, and other US weapons systems where Washington has restrictions on where they can be used.

The policy is a victory for France and other countries that have demanded a “Buy European” approach to the continent’s defence investment push, amid fears over the long-term dependability of the US as a defence partner and supplier sparked by President Donald Trump.

At least 65 per cent of the cost of the products would need to be spent in the EU, Norway and Ukraine.

EU member states would not be able to spend the money on products “where there can be a control on the use or the destination of that weapon . . . It would be a real problem if equipment acquired by countries cannot be used because a third country would object,” one of the officials said.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheMightyCat@lemm.ee 61 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Good stuff, reaming by buying foreign equipment is only kicking the can down the line.

Investing into defense industry that can build new weapons is far stronger then temporarily buying weapons.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 16 points 1 week ago

Or worse, renting or “licensing” weapons.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

"Unless their home countries sign defense pacts", which I kinda expect the UK and Turkey to sign.

[–] eokic@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Dangit, if only we had some sort of defense agreements with the US... /s

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do any European defence companies have SAMs competitive with the Patriot, or are they still a generation behind?

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] sith@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're comparing apples and oranges.

Of those I would say that only Aster 30 + SAMP/T is a viable Patriot alternative.

And I believe IRIS-T is superior to current US alternatives.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

The big advantage of Iris-T is the price of a missile. As in Iris-T is at 250k, Aster30 at 2million and Patriot at 4million. The problem with it is the much shorter range and no anti ballisitc missile capability.

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is going to be so many Boxers..

[–] wieson@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

my beloved 😍

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

We should definitely stop selling weapons there but do we even buy anything from there? They have their own heavy vehicles and AA but I’d be surprised to see a Merkava tank or something in a European army and Iron Dome only works on rocket equivalent of rocks thrown over a wall.

[edit] we probably get ammo

[–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Yes we do. Finland has ordered David's Sling for example.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

PULS is bought by Germany and Spain, with the Netherlands and Denmark using it already.

Germany has also bought Arrow3 as a anti ballistic missile AA system. There is nothing like it available in the EU.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Lots of those advanced Israeli AA weapons are developed together with US defence contractors and multinationals (Arrow3 = Boeing, David’s Sling = Raytheon) so one could hope they’re off the table too.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We already know different countries buy intelligence software for law enforcement purposes. I would not be surprised if other intelligence and cyber warfare suppliers were Israeli.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I doubt tools for policing citizens are in scope of this fund.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you abstract to intelligence tools, which is what they are, I am quite sure they will be included.

EDIT: and indeed they are

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Thanks for finding this! Still holding on to the hope that there’s a difference between electronic warfare and electronic surveillance.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I learned the hard way that hope, like fear, is a bad habit.