this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1136 points (99.7% liked)

Work Reform

11064 readers
862 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago

I worked there back in the early aughts. It actually was a cool retail job that paid reasonably well, a few dollars above minimum, and you got company stock, benefits, a free pound of coffee a week or box of tea, you were invited to company meetings, free drinks on shift, and we did all sorts of cool volunteer stuff, like with the food bank and habitat for humanity, and we would do coffee tastings at events, all sorts of things. It honestly was a fun job lots of the time. It's so sad it's turned into trash.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Shop local. It's just coffee. Don't let the marketers tell you any different. For sweet creamy syrupy treats go to the ice cream store. Let's not support the current system of the bigwig at the top who does very little and reaps most of the rewards.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Plus ordering there takes 3x longer than if I just made a coffee at home. They are not convenient unless you are traveling and have no access to a coffee maker.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Hell even my regular coffee shop does most of the ~~milkshakes~~ fancy coffees that Starbucks does.

I drink black coffee but they do look really good

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

They are hired assasins. Like how they had special officers in WWII to commit the massacres

[–] Eddbopkins@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I have never gone to a Starbucks and I never will. It's not that hard to do that. They will never get even a penny out of me.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Fair warning, if you're brewing coffee at home it's still possible to buy Starbucks.

Most of the coffee at Costco is just rebranded Starbucks beans. A lot of dark roast coffee is secretly shitty Starbucks beans. If it smells like cigarettes at any point, you've probably got Starbucks coffee.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Shouldn't Costco warn people if they're gonna sell burnt ass coffee beans though?

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

The only reason i would go to a Starbucks is to look at the people working and buying coffee there. Or to meet a cute person behind the counter, but i have never nore will i spend money in that

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I already have dirty toilet water at home, I don't see why I would pay Starbucks for it.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 35 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Just for perspective here,

1000 * $15/hr = $15,000 / hr

$96,000,000 / $15,000  / hour = 6,400 hours

6,400 hours / 40 hours / week = 160 weeks

160 weeks / 52.17857 weeks / year = 3.0663929655412174 years

They could afford to keep those employees on for another 3 Years with that amount.

[–] QualifiedKitten@discuss.online 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Was it baristas that were laid off or office workers? Minimum wage for their corporate headquarters is a bit over $20/hour, and I'd suspect very few corporate employees are making only minimum wage.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

That might be fair, but "laid off" has the sort of vibe to it that they didn't get to choose between minimum wage and no job. Also, the federal minimum wage is $7.25 and the minimum wage in Washington state, where starbucks HQ is located is $16.66 so yeah definitely would have to rework the math based on location of the layoffs.

[–] QualifiedKitten@discuss.online 2 points 4 hours ago

Agreed, just trying to point out that if the laid off employees were corporate, not retail, the $15/hr assumption is probably pretty low. If retail, those could be spread across the country, and $15/hr is probably pretty generous. Starbucks HQ is in the city of Seattle, which has an even higher minimum wage than the state (I think $20.76/hour now?).

[–] dragonlobster@programming.dev 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like Luigi got another flag to reach

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Minnels@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Why do the Italians need to keep fighting? Let some others get into the action, like Yoshi or Peaches. We can always branch out and have other Nintendo properties get these guys. How about Zelda or Link?

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They could have paid every one of those employees nearly 6 figures instead. If the company is doing so badly that they feel they need to lay off a thousand people, they should not be handing out CEO bonuses, period.

[–] DogEarBookmark@reddthat.com 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure a good portion of that was union busting, but that's what we're all about now.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago

This would not shock me in the slightest

[–] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 25 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

That's $96,000 per layed off worker

[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.world 27 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

This is the same douche canoe that was the CEO of Chipotle and denied that the serving sizes were getting smaller and told people to just harass the worker making the food if they thought their serving size was to small.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Wait we had permission to do that? I thought I was just being a dick and telling them to "keep going". What a relief, too bad I won't go back.

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Also the same guy trying to green wash plastic waste to be customer responsibility while commuting on a private jet from Southern California to Seattle.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 23 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

There's absolutely no way he's adding enough value compared to Joe MBA to justify that compensation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 31 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I don't get it. We did not let kings and lords and counts keep their belongings. Why are we treating this scum any different?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 5 points 16 hours ago

I guess it’s a good thing I make my own coffee at home. Bonus! It doesn’t taste like burnt bean water!

[–] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

So he literally stole their salaries. We can't put up with millionair ceos anymore, it needs to be outlawed..

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Starbucks gives the new CEO a $96 million bonus, then a month later, lays off 1,000+ ~~workers~~ Potential Luigis.

FTFY.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 17 hours ago
[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Friendly reminder, comrades: There is no such thing as a good billionaire. From the East to the West, they are humanity's enemy.

[–] elfin8er@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

"Good billionaire" is an oxymoron like jumbo shrimp. You can be good, or a billionaire but not both. If you were good, you wouldn't have a billion dollars.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Happy Cake Day!

load more comments
view more: next ›