this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
12 points (83.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

29652 readers
1337 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 10 points 16 hours ago

Uh, no, that's the sort of shit that someone wants to do war crimes would say.

[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Let me phrase it this way: If someone I was dating said this to me, I would run as fast as I can. And my first concern wouldn't be that they might commit a war crime somewhere.

To be honest I was mostly curious about the love part. Obviously then Geneva convention exists but I've never been a fan of the, "I like the hunt" types.

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. We need to have decency in war whenever possible eg not targeting children

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

The war part usually isnt meant a literal war against nations. At least i haven't heard it that way

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

No. Pretty sure the origin of that quote is a Shakespeare villain.

[–] Tarkcanis@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I'm Canadian.

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In love, no absolutely not. That sounds like a justification for rape, spousal abuse, stalking, harassment, cheating, and other kinds of shitty behavior where it is neither expected nor wanted.

In war, yes. I think that war is one of the most horrific things one nation can perpetrate on another and should be exactly that.. If your goal, as a nation, is anything less than the genocide of your target nation's people, the salting of their land, and the complete eradication of their culture, then your issues can and should be solved diplomatically.

And if that is your goal, fuckin' do it.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think that phrase is meant in the figurative "war" not the literal nations going to war

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

That makes more sense. So, personal conflict rather than national conflict?

In my present state of moderate intoxication, I'd say something similar to my above point, but with the opposite statement regarding fairness. If you are unable to resolve your differences via civil discussion, then settle it with a duel with strict rules as follows.

The rules of which should be:

  1. the field should be cleared of bystanders, excepting an impartial referee

  2. The only weapons permitted should be flintlock, smooth bore pistols

  3. Shooting should occur at high noon (or whatever time would give both parties equal visual impairment due to the sun)

  4. Parties should stand twenty paces apart

  5. Parties should fire one round each and then move an additional ten paces apart

  6. Repeat step 4 until at least one party is dead

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 10 points 19 hours ago

No. That's what laws are for. And I hope that the current struggles will lead to more laws to be enforced in war in the future.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 3 points 17 hours ago

No. Few things are fair about either.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago

No. Neither one would change how universally relevant basic ethics are.

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

As blink-182 said in Lemmings: "All's fair in love and war, until you say it isn't, but you're wrong."

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 19 hours ago

It certainly doesn't make murder acceptable.