this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
530 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

8240 readers
2766 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 41 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Nah, y'all should accept delivery then refuse to pay. Give him a taste of his own medicine.

[–] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 44 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So take the planes, send Trump the bill, when he acts confused you tell him he should really be more grateful about this

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 28 points 21 hours ago

"have you said thank you even once"

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I mean, without American replacement parts I don't know how flyable they are. Stiffing the US on something is an option for next play, though.

Edit: So, correction. Interestingly it looks like the US is actually dependent on others for parts itself, and Japan has a good helping of all the parts in the whole plane being built domestically, so maybe not all is lost there. (This link looks legit, but disclaimer that I'm unfamiliar with it and you can't always tell at a glance post-AI)

That being said, the software is definitely closed-source, and all their design.

[–] stray@pawb.social 7 points 18 hours ago

Maybe he should get Mexico to pay for it.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 21 hours ago

A Trump never pays his debts

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 23 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

ooh no, it might provoke the person who is back stabbing us at every conceivable opportunity

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 20 points 21 hours ago

Hell yeah they should. We need to be able to defend ourselves against southern aggression, and the F35 is compromised based on what Trump himself threatened.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

With a potential for an american invasion on the table, I wouldn't want to cancel that deal without another similar plane deal lined up

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 37 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

While I do not believe the US will actually invade Canada, I don't imagine the F35 would be much help in that situation. I am sure there are remote access capabilities to cease their operation, at the very least.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

While I do not believe the US will actually invade Canada

Until a few weeks ago I did not believe the US would impose tariffs on Canada or call it the "51st state," so...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You have to enter a password to start up the F35. That password changes every day and USA needs to give these passwords. Locking a country out of the plane is as simple as stop sending the new passwords.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 20 hours ago

Hmm, opinions on the internet on if that's true are mixed at best. It's a level of control I'd be shocked anyone would accept. Someone on Quora is saying most countries weren't even happy Lockheed Martin manages the supply chain and maintenance software.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 21 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

the potential for an invasion is precisely the reason you don't want the f-35 around. that warbird is the most technologically dependent device ever crafted for warfare. it is deeply vulnerable to an adversary with the knowledge simply bricking it remotely and you're kidding yourself if you don't think the us military wouldn't brick all of them. the better plan is to train with prior gen jets and asymmetric combat using drones.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 20 hours ago

Don't forget the Gripen. There's a great offer for domestic production still on the table, and it's the asymmetric stall-an-invasion fighter.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί