this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
79 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

34388 readers
208 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

IDK who the fuck this guy is but he's speaking my language.

Fuck the advertising revenue model.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Turns everything into smelly shit.

The term you are searching for is enshittification. :)

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Maybe this is the equivalent of defending ethical capitalism, but an ad-supported model can enable poor users to access content they couldn’t afford if it were paid.

[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

That is a problem, because what I tell people all the time is that your data is money. Ad services also serves as a tracking service, and as such gets paid from two directions: from advertisers and mass collection of data.

The problem with both is that they have been devalued in a race to the bottom, mostly thanks to ads swarming the web in the early 2000s.

This also solidifies Google's monopoly, because now all advertiser's have to go through them, as well as Meta or other social networking platforms - which all have their own tracking and ad services.

People are getting grifted, big time.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, that's just how it appears through the advertising revenue model.

Bear in mind this model has been actively developed over the last 20+ years. Imagine of other models enjoyed that kind of attention.

Consumers pay for ads in product costs. Access for poor people is a myth.

[–] waspentalive@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you are too poor to consume the advertised items/services then the actual customers of those products/services are paying for your access.

I personally use an ad-blocker, but I only hate ads because they can be a vector for malware. P.s. I also use StartPage as my search engine of choice.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"Competitor bad, says businessowner"

[–] ares35@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

he co-founded deepmind, which was acquired by google. he also worked at google itself (left last year). he knows a fair bit about google and its inner workings, especially in regards to ai tech integration into its various properties. so more than just a 'competitor' or 'businessowner'

I mean, he’s not wrong in the sense that Google’s paradigm of leveraging ads and data harvesting and monetization on literally everything is a cancer.