It turns out that "critical" here means argumentative, entirely one-sided, and full of spurious objections.
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
10 points (61.4% liked)
Fediverse
28721 readers
87 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I started reading, and it seems to criticize some Polish proposal, rather than anything substantial?
Like, paraphrasing, "the proposal says it worked well in context A, but that doesn't mean it'll work well in context B". I mean, sure, whatever. But not very juicy.
Maybe there's good points in there, but if they had valid criticism they should have spilled the beans right away. If not I'll keep thinking ensuring digital sovreignity and embracing open web standards are good things.
This reads like AI slop, the illustrations certainly don't help. Why are you using debate terms?? None of the claims here are exemplified or argued in any way, ironically given its "criticisms".
AI generally writes much better than this. This reads like someone trying to turn half a page of content into a ten page term paper using nothing but a thesaurus and charts. And who hasnt had tried to do that at least once in their life.
In fairness it does appear to be a literal AI translation from Polish, hence the opaque word "interpellation" in the title.