This reads like AI slop, the illustrations certainly don't help. Why are you using debate terms?? None of the claims here are exemplified or argued in any way, ironically given its "criticisms".

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

AI generally writes much better than this. This reads like someone trying to turn half a page of content into a ten page term paper using nothing but a thesaurus and charts. And who hasnt had tried to do that at least once in their life.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

In fairness it does appear to be a literal AI translation from Polish, hence the opaque word "interpellation" in the title.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It turns out that "critical" here means argumentative, entirely one-sided, and full of spurious objections.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 1 points 6 hours ago

I started reading, and it seems to criticize some Polish proposal, rather than anything substantial?

Like, paraphrasing, "the proposal says it worked well in context A, but that doesn't mean it'll work well in context B". I mean, sure, whatever. But not very juicy.

Maybe there's good points in there, but if they had valid criticism they should have spilled the beans right away. If not I'll keep thinking ensuring digital sovreignity and embracing open web standards are good things.