this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
471 points (98.6% liked)

News

23622 readers
2819 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump is considering privatizing the US Postal Service due to its financial losses, a move that could disrupt shipping and push hundreds of thousands of federal workers out of government.

Citing the USPS’s financial losses, Trump argued the agency should not rely on government subsidies.

While his specific privatization plans remain unclear, Trump previously clashed with the USPS during his first term, attempting to shift control of key functions like labor relations and rate-setting to the Treasury Department.

This move could significantly alter the structure and operations of the USPS if implemented.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

It reminds me of how the right-wing politicians are trying to privatize Correios (the Brazilian Postal Service) here in Brazil. They alleged a similar thing: financial losses, inefficiency, and so on. While Correios doesn't offer a really wonderful service, it's really doubtable if a private company would improve it (spoiler: it won't).

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -4 points 6 days ago

I'm actually surprised that the USPS still exists in its current form. In several European countries, there's now very limited postal service because people just aren't sending regular mail anymore. It's all email and packages. As a result, public postal service have either been more or less shut down or privatized into a parcel service.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 193 points 1 week ago (4 children)

the conservative push to destroy this incredibly successful organization continues. its already been punished more than any other entity by requiring things no other business anywhere is required to.

starve the beast. theyve forced it to make financial considerations that now put it in pretend financial trouble so they can point at it as a failure.

if the USPS was allowed to run as any other business today it would be far more successful on paper than it already is, but conservatives just cant live with that.

[–] lewdian69@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good thing the Democratic administration replaced DeJoy and passed some protections while they were in charge... oh. wait

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't replace him until a board of people fire him...and they didn't.

[–] electricyarn@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (4 children)

There were empty seats on the board that would have tipped the balance, sitting vacant for the entirety of Biden's term.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

it shouldn't have to be 'profitable' in the first place.

yep. no one ever complains about the profitability of our 'defense' system which seems to do more selling than defending.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It was never intended to be. That's why it has the word "service" right there in its name.

The USPS spent $89.5 billion in operations this year, which means that even if they didn't collect a single dime from anybody they could serve everyone in the country with every package and letter that they already did in the entirety of 2024 for about 4.475% of the Defense Department's expenditures in that same time frame -- which are just under two trillion dollars.

The Defense Department as a whole Hoovers up about 24% the Federal budget.

Therefore the fact that the conservatives have successfully bamboozled everyone into believing that the USPS should be run as a "business" in the first place is incredible. Would you support about 0.1 percent of your Federal taxes spent on granting you free Postal Service access forever? I probably would.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 159 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For fuck's sake, it's not meant to make money, it's a public service - it's literally in the name!

I wish more countries governments would get their head out of their capitalistic arses and understand that the services they run aren't meant to be profitable - that's what taxes are meant to be for!

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 week ago (9 children)

You're going to have to get with the times. Everything has to make money or it's scrapped including us.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CitricBase@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago (10 children)

The postal service doesn't lose money, it costs money.

By this logic, the interstate highway system and the military both lose billions! Is Trump going to privatize them too?

[–] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Thats not even a true statement.

The postal service makes money, but any surpless is automatically taken by Congress.

In the early 2000s the GOP passed a law requiring the postal service to upfront load the retirement funds of new employees, creating a massive debt burden.

Also, Congress has removed their ability to modernize equipment and fleets, forcing them to continue repairing aged equipment.

Not to mention, DeJoy, Trump's installment during his first term, has done everything he can to dismantle any modernization because he wants the Post Office sold at rock bottom prices so he can buy it, get this, because he owns competing companies.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Every thing the gop has done to the usps had hurt it more... but everytime I hear "it doesn't make money" well it did before the absolutely idiotic idea to make sure pensions were super funded forward. Ontop of that. Why the fuck does a government organization need to make money? I hate this whole "run a country like a business" bullshit so much. Money makes everything worse.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

Same for public transit.

A bit of compensation isn't a crazy idea, but it doesn't have to break even with the money it does bring in. It's not like we have a ton of toll roads either, it's not an issue to spend billions on another lane or two.

[–] buttfarts@lemy.lol 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The GOP exists to oppose anything that serves the common good. They exist to transfer public wealth to private interests. That is their entire mandate

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Which is why they want to privatize everything... easier to grift from. I just find it hilarious that they take full power, fuck everything up, lose power and point to things saying "see it doesn't work!" And their lapdogs just eat it up. Yes when you cripple something it will fail, and then you blame it or the dems and hey you get to do it again!

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

USPS doesn't lose a dime. It's a service. It costs money to run.

You know, like a government office does.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 80 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Its almost funny how cartoonishly evil the Republicans are. They literally are shutting down all public utilities, giving contracts to the rich, spending trillions in the name of "cutting spending", kicking out random people, and im pretty sure a Republican has openly decared friendship to be his greatest enemy (because "woke" or smth). If this was a simulation the developers are getting extremely lazy with this plotline, the villans are literally just evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Citing the USPS’s financial losses, Trump argued the agency should not rely on government subsidies.

It already doesn't. USPS is entirely internally funded. What a fucking idiot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 66 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh, the financial losses that can be directly linked back to Louis DeJoy's actions while in charge to actively sabotage the service, the same DeJoy that Trump appointed to sabotage the service?

They murdered it so they could sell it off, don't let them claim otherwise

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Atrichum@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fuck the fascists. We fought the British over less tyrannical shit than what Trump is promising.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 43 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Wow, so wild that the agency you crippled with a nonsensical pension funding requirement is no longer running as efficiently as you demand! what a huge surprise, no one could have seen this coming!

Super cool that the Democrats didn't reverse that insane requirement btw.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Super cool that the Democrats didn't reverse that insane requirement btw.

The Democrats did reverse that insane requirement. In 2022.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

doesn't USPS have some special legal status? how are supposed to be things like court orders delivered if not by national mail carrier?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It isn't a business, it is a service, it costs money that our taxes pay, so we don't have to pay shitty private companies. (And it still makes money) "Let's make the Mail just like ISPs" is a stupid take.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given the country's current mood, is it really wise for the oligarchs to threaten the livelihoods of the very group that gave us the expression going postal?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›