this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
-11 points (23.8% liked)

Programming

16971 readers
736 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Large companies don't innovate anymore, they acquire and Google's sourceforge offering is... let's call it underwhelming. If they tried to compete with Github and threw money into Gitlab, what do you think they'd do?

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PoopMonster@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

Buy it, give it a face-lift, add chat and then kill it, all within 2 years.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Google would buy it, pet it for 2 years and then take it out back and old-yeller it.

But not until after Google has used it to get every bit of personal data it has to get more dirt on you.

[–] nottheengineer@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

They'd do what they are doing to android. Make it as unusable as possible without their proprietary crap.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Google already tried doing code hosting once. It didn't work out.

https://code.google.com/archive/

[–] thtroyer@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Which they could have done a much better job with.

It was basically just hosted SVN if I remember right, and they never added git support when it became the de facto version control system.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that's why it would be better for them to buy an existing solution. Google code looked bad, IIRC had some forced integration with google forums (or whatever they're called), and forced a google login. It didn't have a CI either. Gitlab has that and more.

[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

I don't trust Google or Microsoft for privacy and such stuff. But Microsoft does not give up as fast as Google.

[–] IonicFrog@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Google is an advertising company. Something like 80% of their revenue comes from selling ads.

How would spending money on Gitlab support their primary business.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

They're also one of the biggest clouds out there and their cloud has a git + CI offering (that sucks).