this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
62 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
1990 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter's links from its search results after the social network's owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

"For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky," Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Elon going to complain about another conspiracy going on while in reality it's just that when crawlers are not able to open a certain URL they simply assume that the page doesn't exist anymore. Google certainly didn't "retaliate", bots simply couldn't find those pages anymore.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The headline is actually wrong. Google did not do anything to Twitter. Twitter fucked up their own SEO by removing access to its content.

[–] BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is correct.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's a pretty easy and reasonable conclusion to come to if you think about if for more than five seconds. I'm not sure Elon has any toes left after he keeps shooting himself in the feet.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The latest in a seemingly never-ending series of self-owns. Apart from the stress it must put on their devs, it's been entertaining

[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have more than one dev left?

[–] marswarrior@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it's just one guy called Dev.

[–] paper_clip@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And he's on a H1B visa and can't leave.

[–] coffeetest@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Crawl issues I am sure but also user experience issues. Google is sensitive to sending visitors to sites where metrics indicate users do not, like bounce rates etc. I don't use twt but if it is the case you have the be logged in to see anything now, a non-logged in user will click a link from Google hit a login page, and use the back button. I would assume Google will see that as a bad search result and use it less.

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Elon, please buy Reddit and repeat your amazing ideas over there. You are so smart.

[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Spez is already doing his best work to fuck over the platform. Are you certain Elon could do any better?

[–] divingaround@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Spez already said he admires how Elon is running Twitter.

The best part is that Elon is proving to be a pro at losing money left and right while simultaneously inventing new ways to make a social media platform suck to use.

[–] damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I mean there's admiring a ruthless mob boss - and then there is admiring a petty thief that keeps getting arrested and all his plans blow up in this face.

Spez is losing his tiny mind.

[–] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, there's scope to introduce "official" Reddit user badges for 10 bucks a pop and all of sorts of suicidal Musk shenanigans

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait until you have to be logged in to read any posts on Reddit.

[–] Petter1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't we achieve this by turning all subreddit NSFW?

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, but when the users and mods who built the site do it, it's petty and selfish. When the ceo does it, it's brilliant, compounds user value, and improves the security of the user experience. /s

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn’t sound like retaliation to me, it sounds like their scheduled web crawlers are finding that content they used to index is now no longer viewable and this removed from search results. Pretty standard. My guess is that there were 400 million URLs listed and as the crawler uncovers that they are no longer available, that number will keep dropping to reflect only content publicly viewable. If only 500 URLs are now publicly viewable (without logins) then that’s what they will index. Google isn’t a search engine for private companies (unless you pay for the service) they are a public search engine so they make an effort to ensure that only public information is indexed. Some folk game the system (like the old expertsexchange.com) but sooner or later google drops the hammer.

[–] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God, I hated expert sexchange so much. It was a blessing when stack overflow started.

[–] detwaft@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I’m only an amateur but I’m happy to give it a go

[–] Idefinitelydonotknow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am genuinely curious. What's the role of the new CEO if this turd keeps doing everything he can to burn this ish to the ground?

[–] agoramachina@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta have someone to push off the glass cliff

[–] Deez@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for sharing, I hadn’t heard of that expression or phenomenon.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ever heard of the glass cliff? You might even see a name or two on that list that you recognize.

[–] bluestribute@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Has anyone noticed too that if you put AI Blockers on your website Google delists it from their search?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Twitter was an important unifying communications tool during the Arab Spring. The Arab spring was a threat to biz as usual in places like Saudi Arabia. The second largest investor in Twitter is Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia killed and dismembered a journalist from the US, more or less in plain sight. Elon is now killing and dismembering Twitter in plain sight to limit its power as a unifying tool that stands as a demonstrable, active threat to capitalism and oligarchs around the world.

Billionaires do favors for other billionaires. It's part of why spez is trying to tank Reddit. Remember how dangerous Reddit was to capitalism's status quo around the time of GME/Robinhood/Antiwork recently.

The specific moment we're in right now is meant to shatter consolidated organizing power on Reddit as we splinter into several smaller alternative platforms (or for some, disconnect entirely). Not saying we shouldn't be in Lemmy, but calling out the larger reality of the moment.

Billionaires do favors for other billionaires.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

This morning, I needed to use image search for a bit and basically 4/5 links leading to Twitter wouldn't load for various reasons. That was not on Google, but I imagine, they have (had) similar problems.

Well, and for normal search, Twitter results are completely worthless to me, as I don't have an account. So, at this rate, no results from Twitter would be the optimum.

[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

Musky is probably wondering how to charge search engines indexing his site for free

[–] PhoenxBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can someone please ELI5 what his end game is? I refuse to pay attention to twitter, but Elon, he's crazy.

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You are assuming he has one. Before he overpaid for Twitter, he probably thought he would turn it into a successful version of TruthSocial. Then reality came knocking. Now, he may have no idea what he's going to do.

When you were a kid, did you ever take apart an old vacuum cleaner or power tool, thinking "I'm going to make something great out of this"? Then, when you had all the pieces lying around you, you wondered why you even started because you have no idea what you are going to do now? That may be Elon at the moment. He's looking at the parts of his mom's treasured vacuum cleaner, and wondering how he can blame it on the brother his parents never gave him.

[–] Ruorc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blocking users who are not logged in has farther reaching consequences that aren't readily apparent. For example, there was an AMBER Alert a few days ago with a short link to see more info. The link goes back to a Twitter account/tweet. All that time sensitive, useful information was behind a wall where you can't see it unless you log in. Most people aren't going to create an account just to do that.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

This is exactly why we should be encouraging local libraries, universities, law enforcement, city, and county governments how to set up Mastodon servers.

On the one hand, when you have a duty to inform the public, it no longer makes sense to suffer at the whims of tech billionaires. There was a time, for a decade or two, when these sites prioritized access and predictability, but no more. When you have information that you need to have accessible, the only guarantee is to control it yourself. They can still use corporate social media to get the message out to their network, but link it back to their mastodon account. Roll it into their IT departments just like their email server.

On the other hand, it's a critical step for the success of the fediverse. Universal email adoption came about because it was used by government and universities. What you could call the original social network is still an open protocol, it's not owned by any single corporation or government, and still the primary form of communication online. About 2 billion emails have been sent since you started reading this.

[–] Pissy_Badger@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That post image.

Is it just me, or is Elon looking more and more like a movie villain as time goes by?

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep seeing it used for media articles because it's fucking perfect and accurately displays his disdain for the poors. The fact that anyone with less than a billion dollars in net value thinks he cares about them is both baffling and hilarious.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

his disdain for the poors.

Correction: his disdain for everyone who isn't himself. He doesn't even treat his own kids well. His trans daughter changed her name to not be associated with him.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

But he'll gladly suck some Saudi dick if it marginally increases his net value.

Side note; I'm so glad that one of his daughters is trans because it helped expose him for the absolute fucking bigot he is. I stopped being a fanboy after the whole 'pedo guy' incident, and it's been nice to have people finally come to the same realisation I've had and apologise for trying to defend him back then.

[–] dr_doomscroller@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

shirley this has nothing to do with the massive outstanding bill twitter owes to google cloud

[–] Juris_LLM@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

It could be something like that. And stop calling me Shirley.

[–] IlllIIIlllIlllI@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

Great. Do Pinterest next.

[–] Hypx@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

For one thing, this is sad because even more of the Internet is no longer reachable. The Internet shrinks, and will continue to get smaller as enshittification continues.

But on the other hand, this is really starting to look like the death knell of Twitter. It's quickly becoming extremely inconvenient to see any tweets on Twitter now.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. Hopefully they remove links to pinterest, quora and facebook too while they'reat it.

[–] Cras@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I have a chrome plugin to strip any Pinterest results from searches, it's the absolute worst

[–] raunz@mander.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

Can I please get this guy's face off my front page? ._.

[–] nikolqy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Obviously, this is political and dangerous, and Musk should send a letter to HQ telling them to, well, go to sleep and just not wake up. Google knows exactly what they're doing. We already know Google has blacklisted Truth and Rumble, and other sites it doesn't like, and they're about to do it to Twitter. They didn't do this to Reddit when it went private. Also, if you don't believe me, use Bing and search for Truth and Rumble and everything is correctly indexed, then look at Google, and it doesn't index hardly anything.

I've been saying for a while now that Google is one of the most dangerous companies in the world, and one of the most partisan if anything.

If you think I'm being dramatic, just look at some leaked footage to understand how this company operates. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6162889/Leaked-Google-conference-video-shows-founder-comparing-Trump-voters-extremists.html

I won't even mention their news tab, advertising business, insanely biased search results or anything like that, but google in its entirety is an insanely dangerous company that takes action based on their political beliefs, and because of the scale of Twitter and Google, it's definitely discrimination and shouldn't be tolerated. I'm just happy that Google is getting less popular every day.