this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37800 readers
267 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I hate how quickly this site has gained a mainstream foothold while the Fediverse is so much the obvious choice.

We have our issues, Mastodon is far from perfect but you cant tell me that they are somehow problem free.

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Mastodon has terrible discoverability. It feels like a ghost town. It's just not suitable as a Twitter replacement.

[–] drbluefall@toast.ooo 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think this is the primary hitch.

Personally, if there was a service like Bluesky that let you choose your algorithm instead of just being purely chronological, I would jump on that very fast. That's what Bluesky's killer feature is, imo.

Apart from, y'know, not being the hellsite that is Twitter.

[–] kahnclusions@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, if Bluesky can let you create/choose custom algorithms for your feed, why can’t Mastodon?

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

because Mastodon isn't designed to pray on people's lack of self control?

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 3 weeks ago

I would argue that what makes it good. Mastodon is only as good as you make it but you have to take personal responsibility. That's something that people should get accustomed to taking again.

[–] pre@fedia.io 5 points 3 weeks ago

@webghost0101@sopuli.xyz I guess, though, on this occasion, I'm happy for the EU to not look at the data-security of the Fedi. 😆

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is positive news for Bluesky.

If there is fuckery, they have to fix it.
If nothing bad is found is also ok.

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds almost like they should've focused on being properly decentralized sooner.

[–] Xero@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I would prefer to have Mastodon stay out of the limelight because we might need it after they target BlueSky. Mastodon is safe from attacks by an incoming autocratic administration precisely because it is too small for them to give any fucks about.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

That's not how autocratic regimes are operating. Small communities are never safe. In fact, they are convenient targets to make an example of.

They can also be infiltrated with sockpuppets far more easily, like Russia has been doing for a long time now.

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

the EU has been promoting Mastodon and the fediverse ever since Musk bought twitter, encouraging european governments to use Mastodon as a broadcasting platform and funding it through NGI.