this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

artporn

4079 readers
1 users here now

Wander the gallery. Look at the art. Be polite. If you feel able please post some great art :)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Louis William Wain was an English artist best known for his drawings of anthropomorphised cats and kittens.

More cats!

https://artvee.com/artist/louis-wain/

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bonus personification of cats:

more cats

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wain did some awesome psychedelic cats as well.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago
[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago
[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

INTERESTING - I thought it was the same guy!

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For some reason, it's always bothered me in stuff like this, that if one of the animals wears clothing, it implies that "in universe" animals wear clothing, which means any animal not wearing clothing is walking around in the nude.

Basically the same issue as "the implication of Winnie The Pooh wearing only a shirt is that he's walking around swinging his knob about".

[–] transMexicanCRTcowfart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The way I understand it is that, since most of the time it's animals with fur or feathers, they're not really exposing themselves in the same way as humans would in the same situation. Thus, in universe, clothes are a styling choice.

Except for Donald Duck covering his lower body when losing his shirt. That one doesn't make sense in any case.