this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
1560 points (91.4% liked)

Privacy

32517 readers
116 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1560
Please, do not use Brave. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

I have seen many people in this community either talking about switching to Brave, or people who are actively using Brave. I would like to remind people that Brave browser (and by extension their search engine) is not privacy-centric whatsoever.

Brave was already ousted as spyware in the past and the company has made many decisions that are questionable at best. For example, Brave made a cryptocurrency which they then added to a rewards program that is built into the browser to encourage you to enable ads that are controlled by Brave.

Edit: Please be aware that the spyware article on Brave (and the rest of the browsers on the site) is outdated and may not reflect the browser as it is today.

After creating this cryptocurrency and rewards program, they started inserting affiliate codes into URL's. Prior to this they had faked fundraising for popular social media creators.

Do these decisions seem like ones a company that cares about their users (and by extension their privacy) would make? I'd say the answer is a very clear no.

One last thing, Brave illegally promoted an eToro affiliate program making a fortune from its users who will likely lose their money.

Edit: To the people commenting saying how Brave has a good out-of-the-box experience compared to other browsers, yes, it does. However, this is not a warning for your average person, this is a warning for people who actively care about their privacy and don't mind configuring their browser to maximize said privacy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 275 points 1 year ago (38 children)

Brave is literally a grift. Too many people are falling for it.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Too many people only care about the openweb or shitty companies in the comments. They have no fucking willpower, no patience, and no follow through. Their complaints are utterly meaningless because they utterly refuse to stick to their guns.

There's one and literally only one browser that actually stands for all the things the most vocal people around here claim to care about.

Yet, they use Brave.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ehh there is only so much a single person can care about. If you have a life and aren't effectively an activist/lobbyis by profession you can't care about politics both local and global, preserving nature and ecolody, world hunger & disease, and a million other things like which software company is less evil all at once and follow through 100%, supporting all of the causes meaningfully.

Not to mention we have to make compromises, too.

There’s one and literally only one browser that actually stands for all the things the most vocal people around here claim to care about.

Hard disagree. Firefox had its fair share of controversies, it's still technically funded by Google (while not accepting donations), and Mozilla Foundation as a nonprofit is pretty questionable too.

The leadership of Mozilla Corporation is shit too like any other corp; they lay off engineers and give themselves huge bonuses.

It takes them years to even acknowledge simple bugs, let alone actually getting to fix them.

A huge part of why Firefox lost the "browser wars" is also that they failed to make it easy to build into other apps so it could work more like Electron, while also pissing off users with surface changes that break their workflow.

Overall it's better than Chrome especially if you care about privacy, but it's not a huge win.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] Skimmer@lemmy.zip 149 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Brave is not spyware. That website you linked is horrible and full of misinformation. They also claim that Firefox, and even Tor Browser, are spyware. They act as if any and all connections a browser makes are automatically bad and used for spying/tracking.

I won't disagree with the other criticisms of Brave that you made, but just wanted to point that out. That website is just highly unreliable and makes verifiably false claims about the browsers it reviews.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 111 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Let's not forget one of the biggest investors is a right-wing billionaire who runs a corporate intelligence agency that contracts with the DoD. And the only proof we have that he doesn't collect data on Brave's users is the questionable word of the devs.

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave has been off limits for me ever since I saw my QAnon nutjob father using it lol.

[–] 0ddysseus@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Big ol yikes right there

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 points 1 year ago (66 children)

For the comments, can anyone give me an actual reason to use Brave over Firefox (and it's forks)? I guess the cryptocurrency aspect is a reason, but I wouldn't say it's a very good one.

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 135 points 1 year ago

That's actually one of the reasons I do not use Brave.

[–] Matomo@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago (17 children)

My guess is because Brave is a relatively known Chromium browser that's been degoogled. Along with built in ad and tracker blocking, and it's an easy less evil of the two.

I want to like Firefox, both as normal user and as web developer, but something about it keeps bugging me. The UI feels sluggish, sites seem to be slightly less performant, and I can't seem to get used to it.

That said, I've started using Vivaldi, and while it can be considered bloated, I really like the tab options it has, while also offering a degoogled chromium that's being kept to date.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Because all the web devs optimize for chrome because they dominate the market. If more people use Firefox then devs will start to care about performance in it

(You're a dev so I assume you know this. This comment is mainly for other people)

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Brave has been hyped as a privacy browser despite having several major privacy failures baked into it repeatedly. It's 100% hype. You get the same level of privacy on paper by installing Chromium with an ad blocker and tweaking a couple settings. Firefox has better privacy defaults and is better with an ad blocker installed. Chromium has a slight edge on security (FF needs to really push tab isolation harder) but if privacy is your main concern I would always recommend FF.

load more comments (63 replies)
[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Brave was also made by a guy who got kicked out of Mozilla for being homophobic. The cryptocurrency stuff is brave also a major scam, it's a crypto that must first be converted into another crypto before it can be converted into real money. How is that a "currency"?

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally, I trade my monopoly money into beanie babies and use that to pay my rent. I'm homeless.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If nothing else, I would recommend Firefox over Brave for the sole reason of the latter being yet another Chromium browser. It would be nice if we could eat away some of the browser marketshare from Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 year ago (16 children)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Melody@lemmy.one 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I agree with the OP; and I refuse to use Brave. This isn't based in dislike of cryptocurrency in general; but I DESPISE both ADVERTISING AND SHITCOINS (Basically any token or sub-token of a main standalone blockchain that has no real, significant, usable real world value).

Therefore Brave DOES NOT reflect my values. I don't care if advertising networks make any money, I actively hate them enough I want to deprive them due to their behaviors anyway for being so violently anti-user.

I don't use Chrome or Brave because they DO NOT reflect my beliefs regarding web standards either, and I refuse to allow Google and the Chromium and Chrome project to dictate standards either. Particularly of note is their utter failure with both FLOC and WEB-INTEGRITY; both of which are stupidly retarded anti-user and anti-privacy features which are horrible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gornius@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Brave behaving like Win XP era browser with gazillion toolbars installed, with a pinch of crypto and crypto promoting ads should be a giant red flag.

FOSS =/= trusted by default. Why are there so many FOSS evangelists, but such a damn tiny part of them are programmers, let alone programmers able to examine a source code behind such a giant codebase as web browser?

I use Vivaldi, at least their business model is clear, and developer is kind of trusted, and not crypto scammer and homophobe.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] moonmeow@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 year ago

Might I add brave's BAT wallet is garbage. You had to sign up to some random exchange and upload your ID (I didn't), but even that you couldn't even backup your wallet into a new install, so hope that you would never have to format or reinstall or change devices - it'll be a pain to restore, if it was even possible.

Firefox over brave any day.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Newsflash: everything that isn't free and entirely open source is generally spyware these days.

It's amazing how we pilloried RealPlayer and burned its parent company to the fucking ground over two decades ago for far less egregious transgressions than what we now let Meta, Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc get away with.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moitoi@feddit.de 40 points 1 year ago

The issue is wider than Brave. Nowadays, companies build uncritical communities around their products.

If you try to be critical, you loose the community in which you're involved on one side. And, if you are critical from the outside, "you don't understand" like in the "you're not the choose one".

[–] donescobar@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave always marketed itself as hardened privacy browser and the second I saw their shitcoin immediately bells went off.

Either way, I use Librewolf on PC and Mac and lately been giving Arc a try on Mac and I like it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

making (presumably) thousands of dollars off their users

I agree with this post completely but for some reason you finishing with this makes me chuckle.

Oh no! Thousands! They might be able to pay rent for a month or two!

I'm just being cheeky, and while its true what they did was scummy, it also feels like a really.... smallish amount of money?

If we're literally just talking thousands, and not tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands.

But yeah, fuck Brave.

Firefox gang and Hardened Firefox gang here to stay.

Mozilla's got its own problems but that's a story for another day.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wisely@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

Even if they were amazing, it would still be worth using Firefox instead to suppport an alternative to chromium.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why are there daily posts against Brave but not against other browsers? Is Google more trustworthy than Brave?

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 135 points 1 year ago

Because Brave likes to portray itself as privacy friendly. We already know Chrome, Edge and others aren't.

[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because people in this community already know not to use Google Chrome and Microsoft.

[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

daily posts against Brave

Also, where are these daily posts? Personally I haven't seen any saying "don't use Brave" which is why I made this post in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Venomnik0@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I see this exact thread every week now and it's between the same people:

"Oh ok i stopped using it" to "Naw i'll keep using brave"

At this point can we stop this? Brave is trash but people are either too stubborn or just don't care anymore (which is ironic). Either mods just pin this thread and treat this as a "brave is trash" megathread or I don't know.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rose@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I used them for a few weeks before they rolled out their crypto scheme. It honestly felt like they monetized “privacy”, nothing more. So I bailed having zero faith any of their shit worked like they wanted us to think it works.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] droidpenguin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I used to use Brave, then used Bromite but that got abandoned. I think there's another fork of it, but ultimately I just use Firefox which has worked better for me overall.

Browsers are a big attack vector for exploits and security is very important. Firefox releases patches regularly and I don't have to worry about it being abandoned like some others. I disabled whatever telemetry / sponsored stuff they have enabled by default and feel it's a good balance of security & privacy + doesn't have the DRM crap chromium is trying to add.

Their extension support is nice too.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Never used it, I saw some twitter comments from it's CEO and this guy isn't trustable.

I go with Firefox and sometimes epiphany. Last one tries to accomplish the level of the well known ones but is mostly years behind. That's sad, because I really like it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 year ago

I tried them a few years ago before I knew more about things like this, their CEO, etc. I had a problem with them continuously taking over my home page on desktop with their own homepage (much the way Firefox on android does now) after every update. I contacted them on social media where they went on a two day stent of making fun of me for having a problem and gaslighting me that there was a problem because zero other people had ever complained. Super professional there.

[–] woodgen@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Guess what, Firefox also gets the same score on ghis site :)

https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/firefox

Also they both seem to be the better option to Chrome https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/chrome

Not sure if this score applies to vanilla Chromium.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Firefox gets a high rating on default configuration.

The next line explains that with custom configuration, it becomes Not Spyware.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›