this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
272 points (98.6% liked)

News

23627 readers
2479 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The global goal to limit temperature rise to 1.5°C is now deemed “deader than a doornail,” with 2024 likely to surpass this threshold, marking the hottest year on record.

Despite agreements under the Paris accord, emissions continue to climb, pushing the world toward 2.7°C warming and increasing risks of catastrophic climate impacts.

Experts warn of nearing irreversible climate tipping points, such as ice sheet collapse and Amazon dieback.

While progress in clean energy offers hope, scientists emphasize urgent emission reductions, as every fraction of a degree matters to limit damage.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nanami@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“I’m totally unsurprised, like almost all climate scientists, that we are shooting past it at a rapid clip."

Articles on climate change already highlight the most optimistic scenarios. And even those are too scary for some people to accept

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 27 points 1 month ago

The scary ones always end with a hopeful "but if we can start to do something..."

I'm actually encouraged by the negative trend of articles recently. The first step is always acknowledging the problem. The happy endings downplay the facts, so they have to stop.

My prediction though is that we'll set 2.0 C as a new limit. I seem to remember long ago 1.0 C was warned as a point we didn't want to cross, but 1.5 C was the mark when it became mainstream news all the time. Turns out 1.0 C was always the real limit...

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, so our species is doomed, but can we just take the time to appreciate that for an insignificant amount of time during existence of the human race, some people got very, very rich? Doesnt that make this all worthwhile?

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

What irks me more is how people get banned for organizing what will save us, killing the fuck out of the rich. We need open rebellion from admins/mods to allow and encourage that kind of talk, so that we can get some seriously large groups of people organized and marching to that drum beat. Anacyclosis NEEDS to happen, read Polybius, violence is actually the cure from a historical standpoint. Nothing else has worked.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago

We are idiots.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least we got billionaires out of it, phew

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Literally, this is a good point that I haven't thought of.

Notice the increase since 2015, which is when the 1.5C target was introduced.

At best, the target was completely ignored by the people who are both causing the most damage, as well as have the easiest means to mitigate it. At worst (and most cynical) , these unenforced "targets" are just a means of creating new billionaires. Our regulatory agencies and governments have been captured by special interests, and it should be clear to everyone that asking nicely is not working.

We are about to drive this car off the cliff, and billionaires are pressing down harder on the gas. At some point, we are going to have to explain to our children why we doomed them by failing to break out the guillotines.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember the nuclear clock? Let's bring that back, but instead have it be dildos of various sizes with decreasing amounts of lube to symbolize how hard we're about to get fucked.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The doomsday clock is still around and takes climate change into its calculations. we are 90 seconds to midnight as of this year.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I mean if you want. Why wait for anyone else?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

If only someone had warned us