this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
485 points (97.8% liked)

World News

32523 readers
769 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 142 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The continuing American embargo on Cuba after the Cold War has always been toddler tantrum level of pettiness.

I thought Obama had finally closed that chapter, but I was wrong.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Obama had started. But Trump reversed.

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

This was so fucked up. I know presidents shouldn't be able to set things in stone, but it shouldn't be so easy for a petty president to just undo the all last ones things just cause they're a thin skinned bitch

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, the world certainly understands that the US holds a grudge. But Castro is dead. Feels a bit silly at this point

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

From everything I've read over time - it's not even the US that holds a grudge, it's been popular on both sides of politics to end the embargo.

But neither will since it means losing the massive voting bloc of Cuban-Americans in Florida, Florida itself often being a decider of US elections. They don't want the embargo to end and anyone who supports ending it losses their vote.

Their reasons seem to vary, from the worst being wealthy land owners who had their lands taken by Castro only wanting relations normalised if they get their land back to the more common escapees who don't want to normalise relations with the 'Castro government' ever, that Cuba needs to ditch the regime first.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Florida hasn't been a swing state in years, and it's not like Cuban Americans are ever going to vote Democrat regardless.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Why don’t they want it to end?

[–] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Silly and grudge are very interesting terms to describe an illegal embargo that brings millions in the brink of starvation and poverty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

looks like impunity

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

This is the only map I can find where Israel disagrees with the US.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago

Why is Israel voting against itself

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah, the cracker index chart

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Less so that they disagree and more so that it would damage their propaganda potential too much

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] anachronist@midwest.social 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used to believe that the Cuba embargo is due to Cuban refugee vote in Florida.

But that doesn't make sense anymore given that Florida is no longer a swing state. In fact it never really made sense since the demo that is very pro-embargo has always been solidly Republican and therefore unwinnable.

So what really explains the embargo? Quite frankly I think it's banana republic foreign policy and wealthy people in the US not wanting there to be a successful socialist state. For instance, the recent energy crisis in Cuba is driven by the Biden administration sanctioning oil tankers who visit the island. Why on earth would the supposedly pro-Cuba democrats do that? Who asked them to do that? Who had the clout to make them do that? Some losers in Florida who were going to vote for Trump in a red state anyway?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is correct, the US takes the threat of a good example very seriously, and has meddled in every single attempt at building any state, not only communist ones, that refuse to be controlled by US capitalists.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

NGL kinda shocked that the CIA wasn't involved with the Argentine junta.

EDIT: It was! Your map needs more red on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_Argentine_coup_d'%C3%A9tat

[–] lemmyrolinga@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago

"Do you know why there has never been a coup in America? Because there is no US Embassy there! "

Old joke from down here

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

What a stupid policy.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 month ago

Axis of evil.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Embarrassing country to live within, but Hitler talk and our genocidal crusaders state make us the evil of greater proportions now.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just imagine if the UN had teeth for enforcement, at least for overwhelming votes like this. I feel like its one of the biggest oversights of the post WWII order they tried to make.

Big countries, of course, would never allow that, but still.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fedev@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

It's also a shame that Argentina, while it voted in favor, actually wanted to vote against.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgl4y6w2r33o

Not surprising because:

https://apnews.com/article/milei-judaism-hezbollah-israel-hamas-war-netanyahu-d8831369a6bc8a96205d4080d2b2045b

[–] RubicTopaz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago
[–] KammicRelief@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Wtf are those colors, jfc... How bout a hand for us colorblinds.

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

So much better, thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

welcome to the rules based world order that yankeestan is peddling

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 8 points 1 month ago

blockade /blŏ-kād′/ noun

The isolation of a nation, area, city, or harbor by hostile ships or forces in order to prevent the entrance and exit of traffic and commerce. 

The forces used to effect this isolation.

The shutting up of a place by troops or ships, with the purpose of preventing ingress or egress, or the reception of supplies.

"the blockade of the ports of an enemy"
[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The author needs to learn the difference between a blockade and an embargo. Cuba hasn't been under blockade since the end of the missile crisis.

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's very much a blockade in practice since it prevents the vast majority of companies of any country from trading with Cuba.

There are very few companies that would survive competition by sacrificing trade with the nearby US to trade with Cuba instead the way the "embargo" forces them to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›