this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
331 points (98.8% liked)

Work Reform

10137 readers
349 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Encouraging. However, there seems to be a question missing in the discussion: why aren't more people taking the reduced hour offerings?

According to the report itself, after the first stage of trial, 86% of the working population started to negotiate for reduced hours, of the people surveyed, 51% were offered reduced hours and only 14% took them. It's an unprecedented large proportion, but still less than one would expect given the benefits. There are other factors preventing people to do so. I hope there will be a follow-up research to find out why.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I think it's probably like the other commenter said, just money. I think it may be "the other thing"? Where you can have whatever rules and policies in place at the govt level, but if there's a "work hard / sacrifice for dumb reasons" culture solidly entrenched at work...well, writing's on the wall. Do that or be soft-ostracized.

I do think the rules make an impact anywhere there's a functioning government, just by slowly shifting what people see (accept?) as "normal".

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People barely survive on their income as it is, that's why

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 month ago

From the study:

Between 2015 and 2019, following discussions between public sector employers and trade unions, Iceland saw two major public sector trials of a shorter working week for no loss in pay.

[–] IntangibleSloth@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 10 points 1 month ago

Unauthorized use of company time, you pay has bee reduced by 50% for this pay period.

[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So they can choose to take the 36 hour week, right? Guess that means they earn less if they do?

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The article is unclear, but the introduction on the study says:

Between 2015 and 2019, following discussions between public sector employers and trade unions, Iceland saw two major public sector trials of a shorter working week for no loss in pay.

[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Jeez, Scandinavian countries showing how it's done again. How come the rest of the world isn't crying in shame all day?

[–] dafo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Sorry to be that guy, but Scandinavia is just the "peninsula", so Norway, Sweden and Denmark. The Nordics is us three, Finland, Iceland, Färöarna, Åland and Greenland. Basically what you probably think of when you think of Scandinavia.

But yes, we rule 😎

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

Because we're supremely good at inventing thought terminating cliches and right-wing weirdos.

[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Reduced from 40 to 36 hours is in the right direction, but it's still a 5 day work week.