this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
872 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

58315 readers
4674 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Fidelity is currently valuing X at about $9.4 billion"

I found this funny.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

And may it continue to crash and burn. It’s just 4 chan at this point.

[–] fosho@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 hours ago

same as my GameStop shares

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 10 hours ago (6 children)

We knew this was going to happen before he made the purchase.

Everyone said, the best way for Elon to keep his money was to change very little, or even take a hands-off approach.

Masnick suggested this would happen

It was that and so much worse. Moral of the story: Running a huge social media service is hard. Maybe don't assume that because you're a billionaire you're the best at doing stuff.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

I mean the people at Twitter were very happy to sell it off. Remember how they actually sued to force him to go through with the deal and succeeded in stopping him from backing out?

Even if he’d managed it as well as the prior stewards, it was always a losing business.

[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Meanwhile he is on track to become the world's first trillionaire

I think the purchase was more about welding power than any financial gain

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 44 minutes ago

Hasn't his wealth kinda flatlined lately though? X is doing terribly, Tesla is struggling a bit, I think SpaceX is at least doing well.

I don't think he's going to be a trillionaire any time soon.

[–] Another_earthling@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Would you not agree that he has a tool of influence with X? I see that as the main aspect of why you'd still buy twitter, even though he knew he wouldn't earn money with that.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago

First step to becoming a billionaire: start with 1 trillion

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 15 points 7 hours ago

He tried to back out, I don't think any of this was about anything. He's just a dick with a weird sense of humor.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Masnick's post is well put, but also a disturbing reminder of how much power nation-states can exert over the Internet.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah we all knew he overpaid, but losing over 75%? I didn't expect that.

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Twitter wasn't profitable right? So most of the "value" is in the name of the product. Elon changed the name and added his signature to everything the platform was doing, completely changing the platform Twitter is. So yeah, I do get why 75% of the money is gone now.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 38 minutes ago

Changing the name of one of the most valuable brands isn't something I'd expect even him to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't he pay too much for it in the first place?

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 7 points 8 hours ago

Yea. He made a baseless offer before investigating. And the. Got called on it.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 116 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Musk did not buy this as an investment. He bought it to flip elections and manipulate public opinion.

Tesla is writing him a check that will cover the entire purchase price, and Saudi Arabia and Russia will pay the operating costs.

Active users are what matters; if they lost 75% of their users then I'm paying attention.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I think it’s even pettier than that. He’s the loud guy on the forum who literally bought the site so he could be admin.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 13 points 6 hours ago

I think you're giving the guy too much credit. Sometimes things are as they seen. He just didn't like the moderation scheme on Twitter, made a gesture buying it, fumbled a little bit and overbid, then after having been forced to acquire it tried to turn it into something closer to what he wanted it to be.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure he gave an outlandish bid for Twitter to manipulate it's stock prices when he pulled put, but he was sued into following through.

I don't think he ever wanted to buy it, or at least he wanted to crash it's value to come back and buy it on the cheap.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago

Aren't 75% of the users Russian bots? Lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] index@sh.itjust.works 24 points 13 hours ago

Posts about value are ads. Stop give exposure to this guy or his companies

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

That's a good start, now keep going

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 23 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Let’s everyone point and laugh. It humbles people like him, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

I doubt anybody would buy it for a tenth, tbh.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 241 points 21 hours ago (17 children)

Honestly terrifying that they still think it is worth that much.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] istoff@lemmy.world 38 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

If they influence the election to their desired outcome, then the value won't matter. The damage will have been done.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

I remember thinking twitter was bad before he took over

It's now a complete shadow of what it was even just a couple of years ago. Just a quarter of its value seems generous

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 66 points 19 hours ago

Elon Musk's greatest personal achievement has been his tireless work and incredible effort toward disproving the myth of Billionaire Exceptionalism.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 155 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (14 children)

And yet, he's still one of the what, 5 richest people on the planet?

He doesn't give a shit, and neither should you (as nice as the schadenfreude might feel). He got something worth more to him than plain old money - an established propaganda platform, which he is using as he intended - to war monger and otherwise interfere in politics to ensure fascism progresses as fast as he can help it. The "dent" (more like a surface scratch) it put in his finances is completely invisible and irrelevant to him.

And it should be to you, too.

He is NEVER going to end up without means or power, not even fucking close, unless we take them from him, and abolish the system that encouraged and enabled him to amass them in the first place.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

PayPal and Tesla and SpaceX been pretty big successes. But Twitter is a real fuckup for him. It shows that his judgment and temperament and perfect boy genius mystique have all jumped the shark in a big way.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›