Red_October

The real point here is that he was not in danger until he sought it out. He didn't suddenly find himself a bystander in a dangerous situation, he went out of his way to place himself there. He actively sought this situation out, placed himself in harm's way, put in active effort to get himself involved. He then acted like he was just defending himself when he found the exact situation he'd been actively seeking, just so that he had a convenient excuse to shoot some black people.

Elon Musk's greatest personal achievement has been his tireless work and incredible effort toward disproving the myth of Billionaire Exceptionalism.

If he doesn't personally invade any countries, and calls for gun violence against "the undesirables" instead of gas chambers, does he still escape the Nazi label? I need to know what the line is exactly according to you, because he's already trying to put political enemies on an intimidation list and time may be short.

He just wanted to kill people. That they were black made it more attractive, and the property crime was a convenient excuse.

Okay but can he at least wallow with broken legs?

Wait you mean when he grabbed a rifle and traveled an inordinate distance to the scene of a riot and shot two people to death, he wasn't just an innocent bystander after all?

"Free Speech Absolutist."

That shitheel is more likely to buy it and just give it back to Jones.

How are you gonna murder one joke by explaining it, while trying to murder a second joke?

Do you really think all Democrats already have EVs? Because while they're surely the most likely to buy them, they're now also decidedly less likely to buy Tesla. So your "amazing genius" actually just alienated his biggest market demographic.

Elon Musk is a fucking idiot who has done more than anyone else in history to disprove the idea of Billionaire Exceptionalism.

They really hate it when you point out they're just virtue signalling.

I'm sure it's fine, right guys? Guys? This is the AAAA company, it'll be great right?