this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
159 points (97.0% liked)

Movies

7599 readers
290 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Takeaway message — if you want your work shown in theaters, don’t sell your production to Warner-Discovery.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 50 points 3 months ago

I'll do you one better - if you want your work to see the light of day at all, don't sell your production to Warner-Discovery, as it might get cancelled for a tax writeoff.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The fact that 100million dollars is a low budget movie now somehow is mind blowing to me.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

$100 million isn't considered low budget in Hollywood.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

I guess it might be relatively low for the sequel to a cult classic made by a famous director and with a star spangled cast. A lot of directors probably wouldn't limit themselves when they know they don't have to.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

good, I'm glad. I saw it in the theater and the biggest thing I took away from it was an appreciation for not having overdone it. just a fun, nostolgic take on an old halloween classic with ultimately low stakes. hit just the right note as far as I'm concerned.

still 100 million is a lowered budget. sheesh.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hollywood accounting is insane. Offically all movies loose money.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 10 points 3 months ago

What if they could tight money?

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago

Exactly. Nothing about the original screams blockbuster, and nothing about the new one (except maybe some of the casting) does either. It's just a really fun and, in my opinion, overall great movie. There's nothing $50 million could have done to improve upon it. And it is absolutely worth seeing in a cinema.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago

I'm sure I've seen better comedies, but I really can't remember when.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It seems like the money laundering that has infested classical art has inevitably spread to movie and TV seasons, over 100 million budgets what the fuck

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, movie budgets can get ridiculous these days, but making a movie is expensive.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I guess so and inflation threw off my intuition since the rate keeps accelerating. Cleopatra in '63 for 31 million would be over 301 million today in inflation adjusted dollars, and avengers in 2012 at 220 million would be over 318 million today. It's staggering how much less a dollar is worth today than just 12 years ago.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Hey anyone who has seen it, was it good? One of my favorite ongoing comic series is being produced by the guys who wrote Beetlejuice² and produced Wednesday (also haven't seen, hate remakes/reboots by default, stopped after Total Recall.) I'm nervous lol.

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I didn't like it, too many conflicts or villains and not enough screen time to really work with them, there's one with an awesome introduction only to appear for approximately 10 minutes in total and get brushed off easily in the end.

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

there's one with an awesome introduction only to appear for approximately 10 minutes in total and get brushed off easily in the end.

It's funny because there are multiple ones that fit under that description

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

This is something I really loved actually. I never knew where the plot was going to go because there were so many different dynamics going on. At the end everything was tied together, but having so many things in motion made it unpredictable and fun to watch. To me, at least.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I really liked it. I like the first way better but this one is good. The art style was a nice continuation of the original and it had some great practical effects. I love that it had most of the same people. The sound design was good and reminded me of the original. I liked that they explored more of the dead characters from the first one too.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The score was amazing!

I'd rank it up there with the first one - less quirky, but more of a wild ride. My partner preferred the sequel, though she loves both.

I really struggle to understand how anyone could like the original and not like the sequel, unless they only like the old one out of a sense of nostalgia but they've actually grown to have their taste change since.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I was very entertained. If you like the first one I say there's a really good chance you're going to like this one.

[–] Banichan@dormi.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He made us choose between watching it with rude strangers in public and not watching it at all.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

you could probably arrange to watch it with nice people in public. or just wait until it hits streaming in a couple months?