this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
310 points (95.9% liked)

News

22869 readers
4217 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are veering sharply in how they gear up for Tuesday’s presidential debate, setting up a showdown that reflects not just two separate visions for the country but two politicians who approach big moments very differently.

The vice president is cloistered in a historic hotel in downtown Pittsburgh where she can focus on honing crisp two-minute answers, per the debate’s rules. She’s been working with aides since Thursday and chose a venue that allows the Democratic nominee the option of mingling with swing-state voters.

Trump, the Republican nominee, publicly dismisses the value of studying for the debate. The former president is choosing instead to fill his days with campaign-related events on the premise that he’ll know what he needs to do once he steps on the debate stage at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.

“You can go in with all the strategy you want but you have to sort of feel it out as the debate’s taking place,” he said during a town hall with Fox News host Sean Hannity.

Trump then quoted former boxing great Mike Tyson, who said, “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 105 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Kamala Harris will be spending a great deal of time both studying policy and practicing with seasoned opponents and people with a deep understanding of Trump's psychology.

Trump will argue with a cheeseburger.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump will argue with a cheeseburger

And will angrily eat it when it wins the argument

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kind of ironic that Donnie uses that particular Mike Tyson quote because he’s a whiny little bitch who is afraid of direct confrontation and has only ever punched women.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think Harris may be neglecting a key part of necessary prep. She should spend some time at the zoo outside the monkey enclosure dodging their flung shit, or I fear she might lose.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

It’s Pennsylvania, so they’re flinging batteries, but otherwise you’re right.

[–] CrayonMaster@midwest.social 56 points 1 week ago (21 children)

On one hand, my knee jerk reaction is to say debates don't really matter.

On the other hand, Biden literally dropped out over the last one.

[–] Oxymoron@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yeah kinda special case there though I think. But of course they matter to an extent. I think there’s trumps strong hardcore nutter fans who would rather have Putin govern them than Biden or Kamala (actually heard one of them say this on a YT video about Biden).

These people won’t be swayed away from him by anything, therefore debate is irrelevant for them.

Then there are also hardcore anti trump people, the only sensible position to have, frankly. That would be the category I fall into but I’m not American so irrelevant for me lol.

But yeah, for those people, whatever percentage that is the debate doesn’t really matter either.

Then there are some people who are hardcore republicans. Really don’t like Dems but also do kind care about trump being cray cray and maybe cancelling all future elections if he gets in. So these people might be swayed I guess? I dunno. As I’ve wrote this out, I’ve actually more or less come to the conclusion that there really shouldn’t be many people who the debate will change their mind on anything.

But there has to be some undecided but it’s a weird position that I can’t really understand so who knows if it will sway those people either way. Some of them I guess. Also the evidence for these charges against Trump are coming out in a week or so I think, whenever that happens, that’s not gonna be good for trump. That’s for sure. How bad it will affect him I can’t really say, but it’s certainty not gonna increase his support.

So I can only imagine it will thankfully DECREASE IT. Overall I think Trumps bitten off more than he can chew. With these charges and with him basically alienating half the population (women) over abortion, I’d like to THINK, the Dems have this in the bag. But fucking vote people!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

71% of voters say that their mind is made up about Trump. 51% of voters said the same about Harris. There’s a lot of ground for Harris to gain.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 week ago (3 children)

“Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.”

Yes they do Donnie. I wonder if you'll remember that when you're laid out on the debate stage from the beatdown Kamala inflicts on your orange ass.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

He's into being spanked on the ass. Ask Stormy Daniels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] elgordino@fedia.io 40 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I hope Harris doesn’t over prepare, she does need to maintain a certain level of off the cuff affability.

Over preparation was Biden’s fatal error, he was struggling so hard to hit his talking points he couldn’t keep things straight. Obviously things are vastly different with Harris, but she’d be best to not just be a talking point machine.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

That's the main reason I gave up on watching political debates years ago, because nothing ever gets directly answered. It's all fillers and boasting about past hurrahs and talking points.

If they just answered the fucking questions I'd be happy.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 18 points 1 week ago

Calling these things presidential "debates" is rich, indeed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 18 points 1 week ago

Biden’s stutter leads him to greatly overprepare.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

well one advantage she has is that she's not legally dead.

also she seems to actually study things to understand them, not to parrot them by heart. being a prosecutor she probably knows how to study things and make cases.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So Trump's plan is to punch her in the face on live TV?
It's a bold move...

[–] Vikthor@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If he does I would like the Secret Service let her punch him back just to see his orange surprised pikachu face.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You know. That's actually an interesting hypothetical. How does the Secret Service react if two people with Secret Service protection try to fight each other? I imagine they would first protect whoever has the most seniority, as in the current serving president, then current vice president, etc. But what if say, two former presidents try to duke it out?

Or can the president waive Secret Service protection? Since the president has broad immunity for 'official acts', does this mean the president can now duel someone on the White House Lawn at dawn?

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They each have their own protection detail. Each will quickly move to protect the one they are responsible for, which will mean separating them (probably by a lot of distance).

Someone under SS protection can choose to waive it. There are some former presidents who deemed it unnecessary later in life.

No idea about the rest of your hypothetical

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] damniticant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I imagine it would look something like NFL refs trying to breakup a fight.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump pooped his pants at the last debate. Literally pooped his pants and there is audio evidence of it and no one cared.

He's going to spout off a bunch of dog whistle, nonsensical bullshit without answering a single question and his base will eat it up.

I ha e hope for Harris, but this debate will change nothing.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Found the clip. It could have just been a REALLY wet fart, but the fact that the lapel mic picked it up makes me think Biden DEFINITELY heard it.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Couldn't hear it. Quite disappointed. Can you give a time index so I can try again with headphones?

E: ok, I heard it. 🤮 0:14

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flerp@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know you're supposed to confirm things for yourself but I'm very sensitive to audio and sounds have a tendency to stick in my brain. I'll take your word on that so that I don't have to stick my head in a blender later tonight.

load more comments (1 replies)

it's possible it's a really wet fart, but i don't know how many people fart in the middle of talking either.

Could be stomach settling noises or swallowing, but he doesn't seem to be swallowing, idk.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

If the article said that Trump was huffing paint and doing whippits as prep I would believe it.

[–] Oxymoron@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Well yeah. Because Trump’s strategy will just be to talk about all the shit he already talks about, regardless of the question. If he does actually try to answer the question he will likely just waffle, call things fake news, call Kamala a communist, shit like that. Kamala will have a normal strategy of actually answering the questions like literally any other politician would in any other debate. Hopefully she can also shut down Trump with a few simple similar to “he’s weird” comments, because even though it’s a shame that they work, they do actually work for just dismissing his bullshit and are simple to understand for the simple minded.

As I say, it’s a shame so many people are apparently that simple, that stuff like “make America great again” and “fake news, that’s just fake news” actually work: but they do work for persuading certain simple minded people who the Democrats need votes from.

It’s kinda how the whole “when they go low we go high” thing doesn’t actually work as a complete strategy.

Yes she needs to be making coherent, actual points as well. But having the odd simple put down and knowing when something Trump has said is so insane, that it actually doesn’t deserve a proper answer, but simply a dismissal is important.

Otherwise you end up being on the defensive constantly and run out of time to actually make your own coherent points.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sad part is his base won't care how stupid he looks and how great she does. They're beyond reasoning. I do look forward to our future President kicking the shit out of him at the debate though.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Debates aren't for the candidate's supporters. They're for the undecided voters. How anyone is still undecided at this point is the real mystery

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Back in 2004 60 Minutes commentator Andy Rooney said that if you couldn't decide between George Bush and John Kerry in five minutes you were too stupid to have a vote.

edit = I had 2000 not 2004. credit wreel for noting it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm convinced anyone who claims they're undecided is just being polite to the pollster instead of telling them "none of your business". Or "undecided" is some statistical construct based on the last 70 years of data. Or, someone who hasn't been paying attention and doesn't want to admit to their own apathy.

The idea that someone has thoroughly weighed the offerings and is still waiting for more information to make a decision is utter fucking nonsense.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

I was going to say the real mystery is how anyone could vote for the racist, but then yeah, that's why they're voting for him. We have a lot of shitty people in this country, but then again, the world is full of shitty people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (19 children)

if kamala doesn't fucking steam roll in this debate i'm handing over my citizenship card, whoever wants it first can claim it later.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Trump will ramble nonstop, hot mic rule will prevent them from moderating him (as if they would) and Harris will look bad because she has to endure his ramblings because getting into a shouting match will look worse.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's no way they're not anticipating this. We didn't all wake up yesterday to Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Wait, is he gonna take a swing at Harris?

load more comments
view more: next ›