this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
228 points (99.1% liked)

News

23130 readers
3405 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/21661331

A new analysis from The Washington Post reveals that just 50 megadonors are responsible for $1.5 billion in campaign cash for the 2024 presidential cycle.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

I'm probably butchering this one, but: "The law is equal as it is illegal for both a poor man and a rich man to sleep under a bridge."

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their votes are worth more than yours.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Their "free speech" is more powerful because it is neither free nor speech but receives those very protections because of a fucking corrupt right wing SCOTUS decision

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Imaging putting all that money into something useful like against the climate crisis.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is functionally spending money on the climate crisis, on the side of the crisis.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oil Industry to Trump: We'll give you a billion dollars if you fuck up the planet even more when you're in office

Trump: Yea

Source: Literally every news organization in the US

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Source: Trump himself, when he constantly repeats "Drill, baby, drill."

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] tastysnacks@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine the return on investment.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

a sustainable planet on which you can continue to exploit the workforce and customers, a capitalistic dream!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The "victory funds" that Hillary started, Biden continued, and then handed of to Kamala means the legal limit went from 2.5k a person to close to a million.

Because of the loopholes that's used to accomplish that, it also means state parties are drastically underfunded.

And republicans aren't going to just sit there and not do it too, it's likely why trump put his daughter in law in charge of the RNC purse strings.

Neither party wants to change it. Because they both like money and it's easier to get a million from a billionaire than 2.5k from 400 regular Americans, and that's not getting into how "regular Americans" can't afford 2.5k in the first place

If you still didnt understand why both parties cater to the rich, this is why it's gotten even worse since 2016 when Hillary devised this bullshit.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This all goes back to citizens united and giving rights to entities that only exist on paper.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can definitely say that's where it started.

But instead of fixing it, both parties are trying to find more way for the wealthiest to give as much money as possible.

Neither want it fixed, they just want the money

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this is true. some individuals in congress want to like bernie but overall no movement.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And if Hillary hadn't taken over the DNC in the 2016 primary by doing even more shady shit than Citizen's, Bernie would have likely won. Fixed Citizen's and be at the end of his second term.

Unfortunately that didn't happen.

Neoliberals are not on the same side as progressives, we just dont have any other options when primaries have become purely theatrical, if were even lucky enough to get that.

Loads of states only get to vote in a primary weeks or months after the candidate has been "decided" having no say in who the candidate is hurts general turnout and helps Republicans. That's not even getting I to how NH got their primary stolen this year because they kept voting for progressives.

We certainly got a theatrical primary this year.

I'm honestly a little shocked more people aren't upset that party operatives essentially chose the candidate for us twice in a row.

They ignored us when we said Biden was too old and then waited until we couldn't run another primary and leaned on the sham primary "where everyone voted Biden" and then when it became clear he WAS too fucking old and they could no longer hide it, they had party apparatchiks choose the candidate for us.

I am pleased at the momentum behind her because the alternative is outright fascism, but it's clear Harris is a party choice, not a people choice.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Until they can jail the whole board and the C-suite, corporations aren't people.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

United States of Aristocracy.

[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 10 points 1 month ago

Eat the rich.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago

This seems fair.

/s

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kinda puts my $25 into perspective.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes and no. Before Howard Dean, people thought their $25 was important for them but otherwise didn't do much. He showed that enough $25 is the same as huge donations. We really hadn't seen crowdfunding in politics before that.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Which is why President Dean beat GWB.

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Can donating to campaigns be considered gambling?

I know it's a stretch, but if that could be argued, then there may be a possible lawsuit to be brought to court about funding campaigns across state lines.