this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1240 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12020 readers
2119 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 161 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 197 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Was going to say...

A judge agreed with her, and the June ticket was dismissed.

Still, it is annoying that state and municipal officers can drag you to court in your pregnant condition to prove what the legislature has already decided.

Almost as though the police exist to harass and obstruct the rights of citizens, rather than to serve and protect them.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 72 points 1 month ago

The judge only agreed because if they denied, their stupid abortion laws would have to be revisited.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Technically it wasn't the police's job to make that kind of interpretation but after the precedent had been set they should apply the court's decision

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it wasn’t the police’s job to make that kind of interpretation

This was the second ticket she'd had dismissed. The courts had already made the interpretation. Cops simply weren't abiding by it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Hey, at least they're consistent. Also, I can't think of anybody who wants abortion at 34 weeks.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

God does, they create miscarriages all the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 72 points 1 month ago

I like how she admitted she didn't think of the political ramifications and was just working the exploit she'd been given XD

[–] riskable@programming.dev 111 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In Texas, a pregnant black woman or immigrant only counts as 1 and 1/5th person though.

[–] Macallan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

1 and ⅕? So more than a regular person? Did you mean just ⅕?

[–] ebc@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He meant 3/5 (the mother) plus 3/5 (the child), so a total of 6/5.

[–] Macallan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ahh yes ⅗ ... I had it wrong ... Damnit!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago

Don't feel too bad. I had to think about it hard after I wrote the sentence. Then I thought about it some more, triple checked my work using a fractions calculator, then finally hit the submit button 🤣

Fractions are hard. Normal people don't think in fractions (anymore; they probably used to in days of yore).

[–] Raptor_007@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 78 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Aren't there laws against children, babies etc riding in the front seat? Could backfire. /s

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 50 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Children and babies, not fetuses. Should be fine.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If it's a legitimate car crash, a woman's body has ways of shutting that whole thing down.

-Republicans

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 10 points 1 month ago

Nah, you just can't put them in a car seat in the front seat. The uterus is specially designed to protect even in the front seat.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 47 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Unironically should be legal. I think pregnant women should be able to claim child benefit, too.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 46 points 1 month ago (23 children)

According to the article linked by another commenter, it literally is.

She was ticketed, but it was then dismissed in court, because she was right.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What if I'm the one that's high?

High Occupant Vehicle lane?

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They have dedicated carpool lanes?

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

(almost?) all US state highways do, yes

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mr_satan@monyet.cc 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What's a carpool lane? Do we have them in Europe?

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a highway lane that you're only allowed to drive on if you have multiple people driving in the car. So you could avoid traffic, for example. It's supposed to reduce the number of cars on the road.

There is one in Norway it seems, in Trondheim.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›